Universal Rates of Empirical Risk Minimization
Steve Hanneke, Mingyue Xu
Abstract
The well-known empirical risk minimization (ERM) principle is the basis of many widely used machine learning algorithms, and plays an essential role in the classical PAC theory. A common description of a learning algorithm's performance is its so-called"learning curve", that is, the decay of the expected error as a function of the input sample size. As the PAC model fails to explain the behavior of learning curves, recent research has explored an alternative universal learning model and has ultimately revealed a distinction between optimal universal and uniform learning rates (Bousquet et al., 2021). However, a basic understanding of such differences with a particular focus on the ERM principle has yet to be developed. In this paper, we consider the problem of universal learning by ERM in the realizable case and study the possible universal rates. Our main result is a fundamental tetrachotomy: there are only four possible universal learning rates by ERM, namely, the learning curves of any concept class learnable by ERM decay either at , , , or arbitrarily slow rates. Moreover, we provide a complete characterization of which concept classes fall into each of these categories, via new complexity structures. We also develop new combinatorial dimensions which supply sharp asymptotically-valid constant factors for these rates, whenever possible.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 5e3b524e-e84a-4fa7-aac3-a8420eed8ab4Cited by top-tier papers4
- On the Learning Curves of Revenue MaximizationSteve Hanneke, Alkis Kalavasis, Shay Moran, Grigoris VelegkasSTOC 2026 · 1 citation
- Marginal-Nonuniform PAC LearnabilitySteve Hanneke, Shay Moran, Maximilian ThiessenNeurIPS 2025
- Learning Partial Concept Classes and Universal Rates Under Massart NoiseAriel Avital, Klim Efremenko, Steve HannekeICML 2026
- Universal Multiclass Transductive Online LearningSteve Hanneke, Hongao WangICML 2026
Builds on4
- Understanding the Eluder DimensionGene Li, Pritish Kamath, Dylan J. Foster, Nati SrebroNeurIPS 2022 · 22 citations
- Multiclass Learnability Beyond the PAC Framework: Universal Rates and Partial Concept ClassesAlkis Kalavasis, Grigoris Velegkas, Amin KarbasiNeurIPS 2022 · 16 citations
- Universal Rates for Interactive LearningSteve Hanneke, Amin Karbasi, Shay Moran, Grigoris VelegkasNeurIPS 2022 · 7 citations
- A theory of universal learningOlivier Bousquet, Steve Hanneke, Shay Moran, Ramon van Handel et al.STOC 2021
Related papers
- Revisiting Agnostic PAC LearningSteve Hanneke, Kasper Green Larsen, Nikita ZhivotovskiyFOCS 2024 · 1 citation
- Universal Rates for Active LearningSteve Hanneke, Amin Karbasi, Shay Moran, Grigoris VelegkasNeurIPS 2024 · 3 citations
- A Theory of PAC Learnability of Partial Concept ClassesNoga Alon, Steve Hanneke, Ron Holzman, Shay MoranFOCS 2021 · 11 citations
- Probably Approximately Correct Constrained LearningLuiz F. O. Chamon, Alejandro RibeiroNeurIPS 2020 · 67 citations
- Computable PAC Learning of Continuous FeaturesNathanael L. Ackerman, Julian Asilis, Jieqi Di, Cameron E. Freer et al.LICS 2022 · 1 citation
