Improving Flow Matching by Aligning Flow Divergence
Yuhao Huang, Taos Transue, Shih-Hsin Wang, William M. Feldman, Hong Zhang, Bao Wang
Abstract
Conditional flow matching (CFM) stands out as an efficient, simulation-free approach for training flow-based generative models, achieving remarkable performance for data generation. However, CFM is insufficient to ensure accuracy in learning probability paths. In this paper, we introduce a new partial differential equation characterization for the error between the learned and exact probability paths, along with its solution. We show that the total variation gap between the two probability paths is bounded above by a combination of the CFM loss and an associated divergence loss. This theoretical insight leads to the design of a new objective function that simultaneously matches the flow and its divergence. Our new approach improves the performance of the flow-based generative model by a noticeable margin without sacrificing generation efficiency. We showcase the advantages of this enhanced training approach over CFM on several important benchmark tasks, including generative modeling for dynamical systems, DNA sequences, and videos. Code is available at Utah-Math-Data-Science.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 5e085eed-488c-41c8-ab6c-4059bb6c79f6Cited by top-tier papers3
- RMFlow: Refined Mean Flow by a Noise-Injection Step for Multimodal GenerationYuhao Huang, Shih-Hsin Wang, Andrea L. Bertozzi, Bao WangICLR 2026 · 6 citations
- Continuity-Regularized Flow Matching for Offline Reinforcement LearningXiaocong Chen, Siyu Wang, Lina YaoICML 2026
- Test-Time Guidance for Flow-Based Generative Models via Parallel Tempering on Source DistributionsShih-Hsin Wang, Joel Keller, Taos Transue, Drake Brown et al.ICML 2026
Builds on25
- Score-Based Generative Modeling through Stochastic Differential EquationsYang Song, Jascha Sohl-Dickstein, Diederik P. Kingma, Abhishek Kumar et al.ICLR 2021 · 1,270 citations
- Maximum Likelihood Training of Score-Based Diffusion ModelsYang Song, Conor Durkan, Iain Murray, Stefano ErmonNeurIPS 2021 · 958 citations
- Improved Techniques for Training Consistency ModelsYang Song, Prafulla DhariwalICLR 2024 · 383 citations
- Scaling Autoregressive Video ModelsDirk Weissenborn, Oscar Täckström, Jakob UszkoreitICLR 2020 · 252 citations
- AlphaFold Meets Flow Matching for Generating Protein EnsemblesBowen Jing, Bonnie Berger, Tommi S. JaakkolaICML 2024 · 229 citations
Related papers
- Flow Matching for Generative ModelingYaron Lipman, Ricky T. Q. Chen, Heli Ben-Hamu, Maximilian Nickel et al.ICLR 2023 · 87 citations
- Stream-level Flow Matching with Gaussian ProcessesGanchao Wei, Li MaICML 2025
- Variational Flow Matching for Graph GenerationFloor Eijkelboom, Grigory Bartosh, Christian Andersson Naesseth, Max Welling et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 96 citations
- Flow matching achieves almost minimax optimal convergenceKenji Fukumizu, Taiji Suzuki, Noboru Isobe, Kazusato Oko et al.ICLR 2025
- Reflected Flow MatchingTianyu Xie, Yu Zhu, Longlin Yu, Tong Yang et al.ICML 2024 · 11 citations
