MARCH: Multi-Agent Reinforced Check for Hallucination
Zhuo Li, Yupeng Zhang, Pengyu Cheng, Jiajun Song, Mengyu Zhou, Hao Li, Shujie Hu, Yu Qin, Erchao Zhao, Xiaoxi Jiang, Guanjun Jiang
Abstract
Hallucination remains a critical bottleneck for large language models (LLMs), undermining their reliability in real-world applications, especially in Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems. While existing hallucination detection methods employ LLM-as-a-judge to verify LLM outputs against retrieved evidence, they suffer from inherent confirmation bias, where the verifier inadvertently reproduces the errors of the original generation. To address this, we introduce Multi-Agent Reinforced self-Check for Hallucination (MARCH), a framework that enforces rigorous factual alignment by leveraging deliberate information asymmetry. MARCH orchestrates a collaborative pipeline of three specialized agents: a Solver, a Proposer, and a Checker. The Solver generates an initial RAG response, which the Proposer decomposes into claim-level verifiable atomic propositions. Crucially, the Checker validates these propositions against retrieved evidence in isolation, deprived of the Solver's original output. This well-crafted information asymmetry scheme breaks the cycle of self-confirmation bias. By training this pipeline with multiagent reinforcement learning (MARL), we enable the agents to co-evolve and optimize factual adherence. Extensive experiments across hallucination benchmarks demonstrate that MARCH substantially reduces hallucination rates. Notably, an 8B-parameter LLM equipped with MARCH achieves performance competitive with powerful closed-source models. MARCH paves a scalable path for factual self-improvement of LLMs through coevolution. The code is at https://github. com/Qwen-Applications/MARCH .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 5de1dfa1-b61c-4b1a-ab24-b11bb0889375Builds on29
- Reflexion: language agents with verbal reinforcement learningNoah Shinn, Federico Cassano, Ashwin Gopinath, Karthik Narasimhan et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,828 citations
- Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-FeedbackAman Madaan, Niket Tandon, Prakhar Gupta, Skyler Hallinan et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 4,972 citations
- TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human FalsehoodsStephanie Lin, Jacob Hilton, Owain EvansACL 2022 · 3,228 citations
- CAMEL: Communicative Agents for "Mind" Exploration of Large Language Model SocietyGuohao Li, Hasan Hammoud, Hani Itani, Dmitrii Khizbullin et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 1,975 citations
- Self-RAG: Learning to Retrieve, Generate, and Critique through Self-ReflectionAkari Asai, Zeqiu Wu, Yizhong Wang, Avirup Sil et al.ICLR 2024 · 1,798 citations
Related papers
- Improving Retrieval-Augmented Generation through Multi-Agent Reinforcement LearningYiqun Chen, Lingyong Yan, Weiwei Sun, Xinyu Ma et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 47 citations
- RLSeek: Evidence-Grounded Reasoning for RAG Hallucination DetectionZhaoheng Huang, Dacheng Wen, Yutao Zhu, Xiaoying Lian et al.ACL 2026
- InEx: Hallucination Mitigation via Introspection and Cross-Modal Multi-Agent CollaborationZhongyu Yang, Yingfang Yuan, Xuanming Jiang, Baoyi An et al.AAAI 2026 · 5 citations
- Toward Faithful Retrieval-Augmented Generation with Sparse AutoencodersGuangzhi Xiong, Zhenghao He, Bohan Liu, Sanchit Sinha et al.ICLR 2026 · 8 citations
- Benchmarking Large Language Models in Retrieval-Augmented GenerationJiawei Chen, Hongyu Lin, Xianpei Han, Le SunAAAI 2024 · 531 citations
