Accurately Solving Rod Dynamics with Graph Learning
Han Shao, Tassilo Kugelstadt, Torsten Hädrich, Wojtek Palubicki, Jan Bender, Sören Pirk, Dominik L. Michels
Abstract
Iterative solvers are widely used to accurately simulate physical systems. These solvers require initial guesses to generate a sequence of improving approximate solutions. In this contribution, we introduce a novel method to accelerate iterative solvers for rod dynamics with graph networks (GNs) by predicting the initial guesses to reduce the number of iterations. Unlike existing methods that aim to learn physical systems in an end-to-end manner, our approach guarantees long-term stability and therefore leads to more accurate solutions. Furthermore, our method improves the run time performance of traditional iterative solvers for rod dynamics. To explore our method we make use of position-based dynamics (PBD) as a common solver for physical systems and evaluate it by simulating the dynamics of elastic rods. Our approach is able to generalize across different initial conditions, discretizations, and realistic material properties. We demonstrate that it also performs well when taking discontinuous effects into account such as collisions between individual rods. Finally, to illustrate the scalability of our approach, we simulate complex 3D tree models composed of over a thousand individual branch segments swaying in wind fields.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 5dc65ff5-d27b-407d-91c1-d1be7087dd51Cited by top-tier papers6
- Ecoclimates: climate-response modeling of vegetationWojtek Palubicki, Milosz Makowski, Weronika Gajda, Torsten Hädrich et al.SIGGRAPH 2022 · 30 citations
- Rhizomorph: The Coordinated Function of Shoots and RootsBosheng Li, Jonathan Klein, Dominik L. Michels, Bedrich Benes et al.SIGGRAPH 2023 · 18 citations
- Learning 3D Particle-based Simulators from RGB-D VideosWilliam F. Whitney, Tatiana Lopez-Guevara, Tobias Pfaff, Yulia Rubanova et al.ICLR 2024 · 16 citations
- Scintilla: Simulating Combustible Vegetation for WildfiresAndrzej Kokosza, Helge Wrede, Daniel Gonzalez Esparza, Milosz Makowski et al.SIGGRAPH 2024 · 15 citations
- Stressful Tree Modeling: Breaking Branches with StrandsBosheng Li, Nikolas Alexander Schwarz, Wojtek Palubicki, Sören Pirk et al.SIGGRAPH 2025 · 2 citations
Builds on4
- DeepGCNs: Can GCNs Go As Deep As CNNs?Guohao Li, Matthias Müller, Ali K. Thabet, Bernard GhanemICCV 2019 · 1,586 citations
- Learning to Simulate Complex Physics with Graph NetworksAlvaro Sanchez-Gonzalez, Jonathan Godwin, Tobias Pfaff, Rex Ying et al.ICML 2020 · 1,439 citations
- Lagrangian Fluid Simulation with Continuous ConvolutionsBenjamin Ummenhofer, Lukas Prantl, Nils Thuerey, Vladlen KoltunICLR 2020 · 211 citations
- Lagrangian neural style transfer for fluidsByungsoo Kim, Vinicius C. Azevedo, Markus Gross, Barbara SolenthalerSIGGRAPH 2020 · 43 citations
Related papers
- Future Matters for Present: Towards Effective Physical Simulation over MeshesXiao Luo, Junyu Luo, Huiyu Jiang, Hang Zhou et al.KDD 2025
- Learning to Solve PDE-constrained Inverse Problems with Graph NetworksQingqing Zhao, David B. Lindell, Gordon WetzsteinICML 2022 · 52 citations
- Physics-Embedded Neural Networks: Graph Neural PDE Solvers with Mixed Boundary ConditionsMasanobu Horie, Naoto MitsumeNeurIPS 2022 · 65 citations
- Improving Long-Range Interactions in Graph Neural Simulators via Hamiltonian DynamicsTai Hoang, Alessandro Trenta, Alessio Gravina, Niklas Freymuth et al.ICLR 2026 · 6 citations
- Constraint-based graph network simulatorYulia Rubanova, Alvaro Sanchez-Gonzalez, Tobias Pfaff, Peter W. BattagliaICML 2022 · 34 citations
