Sensitivity by Parametricity
Elisabet Lobo Vesga, Alejandro Russo, Marco Gaboardi, Carlos Tomé Cortiñas
Abstract
The work of Fuzz has pioneered the use of functional programming languages where types allow reasoning about the sensitivity of programs. Fuzz and subsequent work (e.g., DFuzz and Duet) use advanced technical devices like linear types, modal types, and partial evaluation. These features usually require the design of a new programming language from scratch—a significant task on its own! While these features are part of the classical toolbox of programming languages, they are often unfamiliar to non-experts in this field. Fortunately, recent studies (e.g., Solo ) have shown that linear and complex types in general, are not strictly needed for the task of determining programs’ sensitivity since this can be achieved by annotating base types with static sensitivity information. In this work, we take a different approach. We propose to enrich base types with information about the metric relation between values, and we present the novel idea of applying parametricity to derive direct proofs for the sensitivity of functions. A direct consequence of our result is that calculating and proving the sensitivity of functions is reduced to simply type-checking in a programming language with support for polymorphism and type-level naturals. We formalize our main result in a calculus, prove its soundness, and implement a software library in the programming language Haskell-where we reason about the sensitivity of canonical examples. We show that the simplicity of our approach allows us to exploit the type inference of the host language to support a limited form of sensitivity inference. Furthermore, we extend the language with a privacy monad to showcase how our library can be used in practical scenarios such as the implementation of differentially private programs, where the privacy guarantees depend on the sensitivity of user-defined functions. Our library, called Spar , is implemented in less than 500 lines of code.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on4
- A Programming Framework for Differential Privacy with Accuracy Concentration BoundsElisabet Lobo Vesga, Alejandro Russo, Marco GaboardiS&P 2020 · 32 citations
- CheckDP: An Automated and Integrated Approach for Proving Differential Privacy or Finding Precise CounterexamplesYuxin Wang, Zeyu Ding, Daniel Kifer, Danfeng ZhangCCS 2020 · 31 citations
- Differentially Private Bayesian ProgrammingGilles Barthe, Gian Pietro Farina, Marco Gaboardi, Emilio Jesús Gallego Arias et al.CCS 2016 · 28 citations
- Solo: a lightweight static analysis for differential privacyChike Abuah, David Darais, Joseph P. NearOOPSLA 2022 · 6 citations
Related papers
- Dependent Coeffects for Local Sensitivity AnalysisVictor Sannier, Patrick BaillotPOPL 2026 · 1 citation
- Giving semantics to program-counter labels via secure effectsAndrew K. Hirsch, Ethan CecchettiPOPL 2021 · 2 citations
- Plausible sealing for gradual parametricityElizabeth Labrada, Matías Toro, Éric Tanter, Dominique DevrieseOOPSLA 2022 · 7 citations
- Partial type constructors: or, making ad hoc datatypes less ad hocMark P. Jones, J. Garrett Morris, Richard A. EisenbergPOPL 2020 · 1 citation
- Data flow refinement type inferenceZvonimir Pavlinovic, Yusen Su, Thomas WiesPOPL 2021 · 15 citations
