Falsification of Unconfoundedness by Testing Independence of Causal Mechanisms
Rickard Karlsson, Jesse H. Krijthe
Abstract
A major challenge in estimating treatment effects in observational studies is the reliance on untestable conditions such as the assumption of no unmeasured confounding. In this work, we propose an algorithm that can falsify the assumption of no unmeasured confounding in a setting with observational data from multiple heterogeneous sources, which we refer to as environments. Our proposed falsification strategy leverages a key observation that unmeasured confounding can cause observed causal mechanisms to appear dependent. Building on this observation, we develop a novel two-stage procedure that detects these dependencies with high statistical power while controlling false positives. The algorithm does not require access to randomized data and, in contrast to other falsification approaches, functions even under transportability violations when the environment has a direct effect on the outcome of interest. To showcase the practical relevance of our approach, we show that our method is able to efficiently detect confounding on both simulated and semi-synthetic data.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 5d769a08-646a-4e66-a8d9-1def8b73f197Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on6
- Causal Discovery in Heterogeneous Environments Under the Sparse Mechanism Shift HypothesisRonan Perry, Julius von Kügelgen, Bernhard SchölkopfNeurIPS 2022 · 84 citations
- Causal de Finetti: On the Identification of Invariant Causal Structure in Exchangeable DataSiyuan Guo, Viktor Tóth, Bernhard Schölkopf, Ferenc HuszarNeurIPS 2023 · 57 citations
- Detecting hidden confounding in observational data using multiple environmentsRickard Karlsson, Jesse H. KrijtheNeurIPS 2023 · 22 citations
- Learning Causal Models under Independent ChangesSarah Mameche, David Kaltenpoth, Jilles VreekenNeurIPS 2023 · 15 citations
- Falsification before Extrapolation in Causal Effect EstimationZeshan M. Hussain, Michael Oberst, Ming-Chieh Shih, David A. SontagNeurIPS 2022 · 11 citations
Related papers
- Doubly robust identification of treatment effects from multiple environmentsPiersilvio De Bartolomeis, Julia Kostin, Javier Abad, Yixin Wang et al.ICLR 2025
- Detecting Unobserved Confounders: A Kernelized Regression ApproachYikai Chen, Yunxin Mao, Chunyuan Zheng, Hao Zou et al.AAAI 2026
- Automating the Selection of Proxy Variables of Unmeasured ConfoundersFeng Xie, Zhengming Chen, Shanshan Luo, Wang Miao et al.ICML 2024 · 5 citations
- Counterfactual Transportability: A Formal ApproachJuan D. Correa, Sanghack Lee, Elias BareinboimICML 2022 · 8 citations
- Detecting and Measuring Confounding Using Causal Mechanism ShiftsAbbavaram Gowtham Reddy, Vineeth N. BalasubramanianNeurIPS 2024 · 7 citations
