Thin and deep Gaussian processes
Daniel Augusto de Souza, Alexander Nikitin, S. T. John, Magnus Ross, Mauricio A. Álvarez, Marc Peter Deisenroth, João Paulo Pordeus Gomes, Diego Mesquita, César Lincoln C. Mattos
Abstract
Gaussian processes (GPs) can provide a principled approach to uncertainty quantification with easy-to-interpret kernel hyperparameters, such as the lengthscale, which controls the correlation distance of function values. However, selecting an appropriate kernel can be challenging. Deep GPs avoid manual kernel engineering by successively parameterizing kernels with GP layers, allowing them to learn low-dimensional embeddings of the inputs that explain the output data. Following the architecture of deep neural networks, the most common deep GPs warp the input space layer-by-layer but lose all the interpretability of shallow GPs. An alternative construction is to successively parameterize the lengthscale of a kernel, improving the interpretability but ultimately giving away the notion of learning lower-dimensional embeddings. Unfortunately, both methods are susceptible to particular pathologies which may hinder fitting and limit their interpretability. This work proposes a novel synthesis of both previous approaches: Thin and Deep GP (TDGP). Each TDGP layer defines locally linear transformations of the original input data maintaining the concept of latent embeddings while also retaining the interpretation of lengthscales of a kernel. Moreover, unlike the prior solutions, TDGP induces non-pathological manifolds that admit learning lower-dimensional representations. We show with theoretical and experimental results that i) TDGP is, unlike previous models, tailored to specifically discover lower-dimensional manifolds in the input data, ii) TDGP behaves well when increasing the number of layers, and iii) TDGP performs well in standard benchmark datasets.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Related papers
- Bayesian Deep Ensembles via the Neural Tangent KernelBobby He, Balaji Lakshminarayanan, Yee Whye TehNeurIPS 2020 · 136 citations
- Activation-level uncertainty in deep neural networksPablo Morales-Alvarez, Daniel Hernández-Lobato, Rafael Molina, José Miguel Hernández-LobatoICLR 2021 · 16 citations
- Deep Variational Implicit ProcessesLuis A. Ortega, Simón Rodríguez Santana, Daniel Hernández-LobatoICLR 2023 · 15 citations
- Uncertainty Quantification with the Empirical Neural Tangent KernelJoseph Wilson, Chris van der Heide, Liam Hodgkinson, Fred RoostaNeurIPS 2025 · 11 citations
- A theory of representation learning gives a deep generalisation of kernel methodsAdam X. Yang, Maxime Robeyns, Edward Milsom, Ben Anson et al.ICML 2023 · 15 citations
