How Effective Can Dropout Be in Multiple Instance Learning ?
Wenhui Zhu, Peijie Qiu, Xiwen Chen, Zhangsihao Yang, Aristeidis Sotiras, Abolfazl Razi, Yalin Wang
Abstract
Multiple Instance Learning (MIL) is a popular weakly-supervised method for various applications, with a particular interest in histological whole slide image (WSI) classification. Due to the gigapixel resolution of WSI, applications of MIL in WSI typically necessitate a two-stage training scheme: first, extract features from the pre-trained backbone and then perform MIL aggregation. However, it is well-known that this suboptimal training scheme suffers from "noisy" feature embeddings from the backbone and inherent weak supervision, hindering MIL from learning rich and generalizable features. However, the most commonly used technique (i.e., dropout) for mitigating this issue has yet to be explored in MIL. In this paper, we empirically explore how effective the dropout can be in MIL. Interestingly, we observe that dropping the topk most important instances within a bag leads to better performance and generalization even under noise attack. Based on this key observation, we propose a novel MIL-specific dropout method, termed MIL-Dropout, which systematically determines which instances to drop. Experiments on five MIL benchmark datasets and two WSI datasets demonstrate that MIL-Dropout boosts the performance of current MIL methods with a negligible computational cost. The code is available at https://github.com/ ChongQingNoSubway/MILDropout .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 5cfc97e9-dd74-40f0-a518-6403d39be853Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on18
- A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual RepresentationsTing Chen, Simon Kornblith, Mohammad Norouzi, Geoffrey E. HintonICML 2020 · 24,064 citations
- Sharpness-aware Minimization for Efficiently Improving GeneralizationPierre Foret, Ariel Kleiner, Hossein Mobahi, Behnam NeyshaburICLR 2021 · 1,861 citations
- TransMIL: Transformer based Correlated Multiple Instance Learning for Whole Slide Image ClassificationZhuchen Shao, Hao Bian, Yang Chen, Yifeng Wang et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 1,163 citations
- Asymmetric Non-Local Neural Networks for Semantic SegmentationZhen Zhu, Mengdu Xu, Song Bai, Tengteng Huang et al.ICCV 2019 · 694 citations
- DTFD-MIL: Double-Tier Feature Distillation Multiple Instance Learning for Histopathology Whole Slide Image ClassificationHongrun Zhang, Yanda Meng, Yitian Zhao, Yihong Qiao et al.CVPR 2022 · 402 citations
Related papers
- Interventional Bag Multi-Instance Learning On Whole-Slide Pathological ImagesTiancheng Lin, Zhimiao Yu, Hongyu Hu, Yi Xu et al.CVPR 2023
- Agent Aggregator with Mask Denoise Mechanism for Histopathology Whole Slide Image AnalysisXitong Ling, Minxi Ouyang, Yizhi Wang, Xinrui Chen et al.ACM MM 2024 · 18 citations
- Predicting Lymph Node Metastasis Using Histopathological Images Based on Multiple Instance Learning With Deep Graph ConvolutionYu Zhao, Fan Yang, Yuqi Fang, Hailing Liu et al.CVPR 2020
- ASMIL: Attention-Stabilized Multiple Instance Learning for Whole-Slide ImagingLinfeng Ye, Shayan Mohajer Hamidi, Zhixiang Chi, Guang Li et al.ICLR 2026 · 9 citations
- Dual-Curriculum Contrastive Multi-Instance Learning for Cancer Prognosis Analysis with Whole Slide ImagesChao Tu, Yu Zhang, Zhenyuan NingNeurIPS 2022 · 24 citations
