NExT: Teaching Large Language Models to Reason about Code Execution
Ansong Ni, Miltiadis Allamanis, Arman Cohan, Yinlin Deng, Kensen Shi, Charles Sutton, Pengcheng Yin
Abstract
A fundamental skill among human developers is the ability to understand and reason about program execution. As an example, a programmer can mentally simulate code execution in natural language to debug and repair code (aka. rubber duck debugging). However, large language models (LLMs) of code are typically trained on the surface textual form of programs, thus may lack a semantic understanding of how programs execute at run-time. To address this issue, we propose NExT, a method to teach LLMs to inspect the execution traces of programs (variable states of executed lines) and reason about their run-time behavior through chain-of-thought (CoT) rationales. Specifically, NExT uses self-training to bootstrap a synthetic training set of execution-aware rationales that lead to correct task solutions (e.g., fixed programs) without laborious manual annotation. Experiments on program repair tasks based on M bp p and H u man E val demonstrate that NExT improves the fix rate of a PaLM 2 model, by 26.1% and 14.3% absolute, respectively, with significantly improved rationale quality as verified by automated metrics and human raters. Our model can also generalize to scenarios where program traces are absent at test-time.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers26
- Mitigating Overthinking in Large Reasoning Models via Manifold SteeringYao Huang, Huanran Chen, Shouwei Ruan, Yichi Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 45 citations
- Is Programming by Example Solved by LLMs?Wen-Ding Li, Kevin EllisNeurIPS 2024 · 45 citations
- CodeCrash: Exposing LLM Fragility to Misleading Natural Language in Code ReasoningMan Ho Lam, Chaozheng Wang, Jen-Tse Huang, Michael R. LyuNeurIPS 2025 · 16 citations
- SemCoder: Training Code Language Models with Comprehensive Semantics ReasoningYangruibo Ding, Jinjun Peng, Marcus J. Min, Gail E. Kaiser et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 13 citations
- Learning to Edit Visual Programs with Self-SupervisionR. Kenny Jones, Renhao Zhang, Aditya Ganeshan, Daniel RitchieNeurIPS 2024 · 9 citations
Builds on30
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-FeedbackAman Madaan, Niket Tandon, Prakhar Gupta, Skyler Hallinan et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 4,972 citations
- Let's Verify Step by StepHunter Lightman, Vineet Kosaraju, Yuri Burda, Harrison Edwards et al.ICLR 2024 · 3,045 citations
- Is Your Code Generated by ChatGPT Really Correct? Rigorous Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code GenerationJiawei Liu, Chunqiu Steven Xia, Yuyao Wang, Lingming ZhangNeurIPS 2023 · 2,317 citations
- STaR: Bootstrapping Reasoning With ReasoningEric Zelikman, Yuhuai Wu, Jesse Mu, Noah D. GoodmanNeurIPS 2022 · 1,126 citations
Related papers
- Teaching Large Language Models to Self-DebugXinyun Chen, Maxwell Lin, Nathanael Schärli, Denny ZhouICLR 2024 · 1,085 citations
- LeDex: Training LLMs to Better Self-Debug and Explain CodeNan Jiang, Xiaopeng Li, Shiqi Wang, Qiang Zhou et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 6 citations
- T-REX: Teaching Large Language Models to Reason with Verbalized Execution SemanticsYan Wang, Ling Ding, Jiechen Sun, Tien N. Nguyen et al.OOPSLA 2026
- ThinkRepair: Self-Directed Automated Program RepairXin Yin, Chao Ni, Shaohua Wang, Zhenhao Li et al.ISSTA 2024 · 37 citations
- Revisiting Chain-of-Thought in Code Generation: Do Language Models Need to Learn Reasoning before Coding?Renbiao Liu, Anqi Li, Chaoding Yang, Hui Sun et al.ICML 2025
