LoCt-Instruct: An Automatic Pipeline for Constructing Datasets of Logical Continuous Instructions
Hongyu Sun, Yusuke Sakai, Haruki Sakajo, Shintaro Ozaki, Kazuki Hayashi, Hidetaka Kamigaito, Taro Watanabe
Abstract
Continuous instruction following closely mirrors real-world tasks by requiring models to solve sequences of interdependent steps, yet existing multi-step instruction datasets suffer from three key limitations: (1) lack of logical coherence across turns, (2) narrow topical breadth and depth, and (3) reliance on rigid templates or heavy manual effort. We introduce LoCt-Pipeline, a novel pipeline that leverages modern LLMs' reasoning capabilities to assemble rich, topic-related single-instruction data into multi-turn dialogues, producing chains that are logically coherent, progressively deepen in content, and span diverse domains without fixed templates or extensive human annotation. We employed this pipeline to construct LoCt-Instruct for assessing models' problemsolving abilities. The generated chains serve as a testbed for benchmarking a variety of models, including reasoning-oriented architectures, instruction-tuned variants, and state-of-the-art closed-source LLMs on their capacity to follow and correctly respond to each step. Our results reveal a substantial performance gap between current LLMs and human solvers. These findings highlight the need for more robust continuous instruction following. We publicly release the dataset 1 and end-to-end pipeline 2 .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 5c41b362-b3af-4e72-806c-f253a27bb8a4Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on11
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP TasksPatrick Lewis, Ethan Perez, Aleksandra Piktus, Fabio Petroni et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 19,162 citations
- Large Language Models are Zero-Shot ReasonersTakeshi Kojima, Shixiang Shane Gu, Machel Reid, Yutaka Matsuo et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 8,168 citations
- Finetuned Language Models are Zero-Shot LearnersJason Wei, Maarten Bosma, Vincent Y. Zhao, Kelvin Guu et al.ICLR 2022 · 4,966 citations
- WizardLM: Empowering Large Pre-Trained Language Models to Follow Complex InstructionsCan Xu, Qingfeng Sun, Kai Zheng, Xiubo Geng et al.ICLR 2024 · 1,206 citations
Related papers
- Chain-of-Instructions: Compositional Instruction Tuning on Large Language ModelsShirley Anugrah Hayati, Taehee Jung, Tristan Bodding-Long, Sudipta Kar et al.AAAI 2025 · 14 citations
- Multimodal Self-Instruct: Synthetic Abstract Image and Visual Reasoning Instruction Using Language ModelWenqi Zhang, Zhenglin Cheng, Yuanyu He, Mengna Wang et al.EMNLP 2024 · 1 citation
- ConInstruct: Evaluating Large Language Models on Conflict Detection and Resolution in InstructionsXingwei He, Qianru Zhang, Pengfei Chen, Guanhua Chen et al.AAAI 2026 · 2 citations
- Language Models Are Greedy Reasoners: A Systematic Formal Analysis of Chain-of-ThoughtAbulhair Saparov, He HeICLR 2023 · 38 citations
- Scaling Reasoning, Losing Control: Evaluating Instruction Following in Large Reasoning ModelsTingchen Fu, Yafu Li, Jiawei Gu, Xiaoye Qu et al.ACL 2026 · 25 citations
