Robust Preference Alignment via Directional Neighborhood Consensus
Ruochen Mao, Yuling Shi, Xiaodong Gu, Jiaheng Wei
Abstract
Aligning large language models with human preferences is critical for creating reliable and controllable AI systems. A human preference can be visualized as a high-dimensional vector where different directions represent trade-offs between desired attributes (e.g., helpfulness vs. verbosity). Yet, because the training data often reflects dominant, average preferences, LLMs tend to perform well on com- mon requests but falls short in specific, individual needs. This mismatch creates a preference coverage gap. Existing methods often address this through costly retraining, which may not be generalized to the full spectrum of diverse preferences. This brittleness means that when a user’s request reflects a nuanced preference deviating from the training data’s central tendency, model performance can degrade unpredictably. To address this challenge, we introduce Robust Preference Selection (RPS), a post-hoc, training-free method by leveraging directional neighborhood consensus. Instead of forcing a model to generate a response from a single, highly specific preference, RPS samples multiple responses from a local neighborhood of related preferences to create a superior candidate pool. It then selects the re- sponse that best aligns with the user’s original intent. We provide a theoretical framework showing that, under mild conditions where (i) nearby preference direc- tions correspond to better-trained regions of the model and (ii) the reward-model scores change smoothly with small angular changes in the preference vector, our neighborhood generation strategy yields a higher expected best score than a strong baseline that also samples multiple candidates. Comprehensive experiments across three distinct alignment paradigms (DPA, DPO, and SFT) demonstrate that RPS consistently improves robustness against this baseline, achieving win rates of up to 69% on challenging preferences from under-represented regions of the space without any model retraining. Our work presents a practical, theoretically-grounded solution for enhancing the reliability of preference-aligned models.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 5b290fdd-c26e-41ec-9c85-40fff3dd5c7eCited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on12
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
- Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language ModelsXuezhi Wang, Jason Wei, Dale Schuurmans, Quoc V. Le et al.ICLR 2023 · 681 citations
- ULTRAFEEDBACK: Boosting Language Models with Scaled AI FeedbackGanqu Cui, Lifan Yuan, Ning Ding, Guanming Yao et al.ICML 2024 · 286 citations
Related papers
- Arithmetic Control of LLMs for Diverse User Preferences: Directional Preference Alignment with Multi-Objective RewardsHaoxiang Wang, Yong Lin, Wei Xiong, Rui Yang et al.ACL 2024
- Provably Mitigating Overoptimization in RLHF: Your SFT Loss is Implicitly an Adversarial RegularizerZhihan Liu, Miao Lu, Shenao Zhang, Boyi Liu et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 119 citations
- Robust Reinforcement Learning from Corrupted Human FeedbackAlexander Bukharin, Ilgee Hong, Haoming Jiang, Zichong Li et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 30 citations
- ROPO: Robust Preference Optimization for Large Language ModelsXize Liang, Chao Chen, Shuang Qiu, Jie Wang et al.ICML 2025
- Doubly Robust Alignment for Large Language ModelsErhan Xu, Kai Ye, Hongyi Zhou, Luhan Zhu et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 14 citations
