Do LLMs Know to Respect Copyright Notice?
Jialiang Xu, Shenglan Li, Zhaozhuo Xu, Denghui Zhang
Abstract
Prior study shows that LLMs sometimes generate content that violates copyright. In this paper, we study another important yet underexplored problem, i.e., will LLMs respect copyright information in user input, and behave accordingly? The research problem is critical, as a negative answer would imply that LLMs will become the primary facilitator and accelerator of copyright infringement behavior. We conducted a series of experiments using a diverse set of language models, user prompts, and copyrighted materials, including books, news articles, API documentation, and movie scripts. Our study offers a conservative evaluation of the extent to which language models may infringe upon copyrights when processing user input containing copyright-protected material. This research emphasizes the need for further investigation and the importance of ensuring LLMs respect copyright regulations when handling user input to prevent unauthorized use or reproduction of protected content. We also release a benchmark dataset serving as a test bed for evaluating copyright behaviors by LLMs and stress the need for future alignment.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 5abf6165-53e7-4edc-988c-302de08e86a4Cited by top-tier papers2
- What Makes a Good Natural Language Prompt?Do Xuan Long, Duy Dinh, Ngoc-Hai Nguyen, Kenji Kawaguchi et al.ACL 2025 · 13 citations
- Bridging the Copyright Gap: Do Large Vision-Language Models Recognize and Respect Copyrighted Content?Naen Xu, Jinghuai Zhang, Changjiang Li, Hengyu An et al.AAAI 2026 · 6 citations
Builds on16
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTTianyi Zhang, Varsha Kishore, Felix Wu, Kilian Q. Weinberger et al.ICLR 2020 · 8,443 citations
- Extracting Training Data from Large Language ModelsNicholas Carlini, Florian Tramèr, Eric Wallace, Matthew Jagielski et al.USENIX Security 2021 · 2,866 citations
- The Secret Sharer: Evaluating and Testing Unintended Memorization in Neural NetworksNicholas Carlini, Chang Liu, Úlfar Erlingsson, Jernej Kos et al.USENIX Security 2019 · 1,386 citations
Related papers
- Copyright-Bench: Agentic Evaluation of Copyright Law ComplianceZheng Hui, Doni Bloomfield, Noam KoltICML 2026 · 1 citation
- SHIELD: Evaluation and Defense Strategies for Copyright Compliance in LLM Text GenerationXiaoze Liu, Ting Sun, Tianyang Xu, Feijie Wu et al.EMNLP 2024 · 4 citations
- CopyBench: Measuring Literal and Non-Literal Reproduction of Copyright-Protected Text in Language Model GenerationTong Chen, Akari Asai, Niloofar Mireshghallah, Sewon Min et al.EMNLP 2024 · 4 citations
- Investigating How Pre-training Data Leakage Affects Models' Reproduction and Detection CapabilitiesMasahiro Kaneko, Timothy BaldwinEMNLP 2025 · 2 citations
- Can Watermarking Large Language Models Prevent Copyrighted Text Generation and Hide Training Data?Michael-Andrei Panaitescu-Liess, Zora Che, Bang An, Yuancheng Xu et al.AAAI 2025 · 21 citations
