Machine Learning-Powered Combinatorial Clock Auction
Ermis Nikiforos Soumalias, Jakob Weissteiner, Jakob Heiss, Sven Seuken
Abstract
We study the design of iterative combinatorial auctions (ICAs). The main challenge in this domain is that the bundle space grows exponentially in the number of items. To address this, several papers have recently proposed machine learning (ML)-based preference elicitation algorithms that aim to elicit only the most important information from bidders. However, from a practical point of view, the main shortcoming of this prior work is that those designs elicit bidders' preferences via value queries (i.e., "What is your value for the bundle A, B?"). In most real-world ICA domains, value queries are considered impractical, since they impose an unrealistically high cognitive burden on bidders, which is why they are not used in practice. In this paper, we address this shortcoming by designing an ML-powered combinatorial clock auction that elicits information from the bidders only via demand queries (i.e., "At prices p, what is your most preferred bundle of items?"). We make two key technical contributions: First, we present a novel method for training an ML model on demand queries. Second, based on those trained ML models, we introduce an efficient method for determining the demand query with the highest clearing potential, for which we also provide a theoretical foundation. We experimentally evaluate our ML-based demand query mechanism in several spectrum auction domains and compare it against the most established real-world ICA: the combinatorial clock auction (CCA). Our mechanism significantly outperforms the CCA in terms of efficiency in all domains, it achieves higher efficiency in a significantly reduced number of rounds, and, using linear prices, it exhibits vastly higher clearing potential. Thus, with this paper we bridge the gap between research and practice and propose the first practical ML-powered ICA.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on3
- Differentiation of Blackbox Combinatorial SolversMarin Vlastelica Pogancic, Anselm Paulus, Vít Musil, Georg Martius et al.ICLR 2020 · 341 citations
- Deep Learning-Powered Iterative Combinatorial AuctionsJakob Weissteiner, Sven SeukenAAAI 2020 · 33 citations
- Bayesian Optimization-Based Combinatorial AssignmentJakob Weissteiner, Jakob Heiss, Julien Siems, Sven SeukenAAAI 2023 · 14 citations
Related papers
- Improved Truthful Mechanisms for Subadditive Combinatorial Auctions: Breaking the Logarithmic BarrierSepehr Assadi, Thomas Kesselheim, Sahil SinglaSODA 2021 · 22 citations
- Automated Deterministic Auction Design with Objective DecompositionZhijian Duan, Haoran Sun, Yichong Xia, Siqiang Wang et al.WWW 2026 · 1 citation
- BundleFlow: Deep Menus for Combinatorial Auctions by Diffusion-Based OptimizationTonghan Wang, Yanchen Jiang, David C. ParkesNeurIPS 2025 · 7 citations
- Clock Auctions Augmented with Unreliable AdviceVasilis Gkatzelis, Daniel Schoepflin, Xizhi TanSODA 2025 · 2 citations
- Increasing Revenue in Efficient Combinatorial Auctions by Learning to Generate Artificial CompetitionMaria-Florina Balcan, Siddharth Prasad, Tuomas SandholmAAAI 2025 · 4 citations
