Rethinking Residual Errors in Compensation-based LLM Quantization
Shuaiting Li, Juncan Deng, Kedong Xu, Rongtao Deng, Hong Gu, Minghan Jiang, Haibin Shen, Kejie Huang
Abstract
Methods based on weight compensation, which iteratively apply quantization and weight compensation to minimize the output error, have recently demonstrated remarkable success in quantizing Large Language Models (LLMs). The representative work, GPTQ, introduces several key techniques that make such iterative methods practical for LLMs with billions of parameters. GPTAQ extends this approach by introducing an asymmetric calibration process that aligns the output of each quantized layer with its full-precision counterpart, incorporating a residual error into the weight compensation framework. In this work, we revisit the formulation of the residual error. We identify a sub-optimal calibration objective in existing methods: during the intra-layer calibration process, they align the quantized output with the output from compensated weights, rather than the true output from the original full-precision model. Therefore, we redefine the objective to precisely align the quantized model's output with the original output of the full-precision model at each step. We then reveal that the residual error originates not only from the output difference of the preceding layer but also from the discrepancy between the compensated and original weights within each layer, which we name the 'compensation-aware error'. By inheriting the neuron decomposition technique from GPTAQ, we can efficiently incorporate this compensation-aware error into the weight update process. Extensive experiments on various LLMs and quantization settings demonstrate that our proposed enhancements integrate seamlessly with both GPTQ and GPTAQ, significantly improving their quantization performance. Our code is publicly available at https://github.com/list0830/ResComp.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on13
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Training data-efficient image transformers & distillation through attentionHugo Touvron, Matthieu Cord, Matthijs Douze, Francisco Massa et al.ICML 2021 · 8,974 citations
- WinoGrande: An Adversarial Winograd Schema Challenge at ScaleKeisuke Sakaguchi, Ronan Le Bras, Chandra Bhagavatula, Yejin ChoiAAAI 2020 · 3,037 citations
- PIQA: Reasoning about Physical Commonsense in Natural LanguageYonatan Bisk, Rowan Zellers, Ronan Le Bras, Jianfeng Gao et al.AAAI 2020 · 2,916 citations
- SmoothQuant: Accurate and Efficient Post-Training Quantization for Large Language ModelsGuangxuan Xiao, Ji Lin, Mickaël Seznec, Hao Wu et al.ICML 2023 · 1,493 citations
Related papers
- GPTAQ: Efficient Finetuning-Free Quantization for Asymmetric CalibrationYuhang Li, Ruokai Yin, Donghyun Lee, Shiting Xiao et al.ICML 2025
- First-Order Error Matters: Accurate Compensation for Quantized Large Language ModelsXingyu Zheng, Haotong Qin, Yuye Li, Haoran Chu et al.AAAI 2026 · 2 citations
- OAC: Output-adaptive Calibration for Accurate Post-training QuantizationAli Edalati, Alireza Ghaffari, Mahsa Ghazvini Nejad, Lu Hou et al.AAAI 2025 · 8 citations
- Quantization Error Propagation: Revisiting Layer-Wise Post-Training QuantizationYamato Arai, Yuma IchikawaNeurIPS 2025 · 46 citations
- SERQ: Saliency-Aware Low-Rank Error Reconstruction for LLM QuantizationYeonsik Park, Hyeonseong Kim, Seungkyu ChoiICLR 2026 · 1 citation
