Multi-Marginal Flow Matching with Adversarially Learnt Interpolants
Oskar Kviman, Kirill Tamogashev, Nicola Branchini, Víctor Elvira, Jens Lagergren, Nikolay Malkin
Abstract
Learning the dynamics of a process given sampled observations at several time points is an important but difficult task in many scientific applications. When no ground-truth trajectories are available, but one has only snapshots of data taken at discrete time steps, the problem of modelling the dynamics, and thus inferring the underlying trajectories, can be solved by multi-marginal generalisations of flow matching algorithms. This paper introduces a novel flow matching method that overcomes the limitations of existing multi-marginal trajectory inference algorithms. Our proposed method, ALI-CFM, uses a GAN-inspired adversarial loss to fit neurally parameterised interpolant curves between source and target points such that the marginal distributions at intermediate time points are close to the observed distributions. The resulting interpolants are smooth trajectories that, as we show, are unique under mild assumptions. These interpolants are subsequently marginalised by a flow matching algorithm, yielding a trained vector field for the underlying dynamics. ALI-CFM outperforms existing baselines on spatial transcriptomics and cell tracking problems, while performing on par with them on single-cell trajectory prediction, which showcases its versatility and scalability.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 5a77b00e-a3a5-42cf-85c4-d3235b8ccca8Builds on8
- TrajectoryNet: A Dynamic Optimal Transport Network for Modeling Cellular DynamicsAlexander Tong, Jessie Huang, Guy Wolf, David van Dijk et al.ICML 2020 · 257 citations
- The GAN is dead; long live the GAN! A Modern GAN BaselineNick Huang, Aaron Gokaslan, Volodymyr Kuleshov, James TompkinNeurIPS 2024 · 111 citations
- Metric Flow Matching for Smooth Interpolations on the Data ManifoldKacper Kapusniak, Peter Potaptchik, Teodora Reu, Leo Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 89 citations
- Flow Matching for Generative ModelingYaron Lipman, Ricky T. Q. Chen, Heli Ben-Hamu, Maximilian Nickel et al.ICLR 2023 · 87 citations
- Flow Straight and Fast: Learning to Generate and Transfer Data with Rectified FlowXingchao Liu, Chengyue Gong, Qiang LiuICLR 2023 · 75 citations
Related papers
- Modeling Complex System Dynamics with Flow Matching Across Time and ConditionsMartin Rohbeck, Edward De Brouwer, Charlotte Bunne, Jan-Christian Huetter et al.ICLR 2025
- Multimarginal flow matching with optimal transport potentialsRaghav Kansal, David Crair, Nghia Nguyen, Scott Pope et al.ICML 2026
- Stream-level Flow Matching with Gaussian ProcessesGanchao Wei, Li MaICML 2025
- Curly Flow Matching for Learning Non-gradient Field DynamicsKatarina Petrovic, Lazar Atanackovic, Viggo Moro, Kacper Kapusniak et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 23 citations
- Multi-Marginal Stochastic Flow Matching for High-Dimensional Snapshot Data at Irregular Time PointsJustin Lee, Behnaz Moradijamei, Heman ShakeriICML 2025
