Classification Under Human Assistance
Abir De, Nastaran Okati, Ali Zarezade, Manuel Gomez Rodriguez
Abstract
Most supervised learning models are trained for full automation. However, their predictions are sometimes worse than those by human experts on some specific instances. Motivated by this empirical observation, our goal is to design classifiers that are optimized to operate under different automation levels. More specifically, we focus on convex margin-based classifiers and first show that the problem is NP-hard. Then, we further show that, for support vector machines, the corresponding objective function can be expressed as the difference of two functions f = g -c, where g is monotone, non-negative and γ-weakly submodular, and c is non-negative and modular. This representation allows us to utilize a recently introduced deterministic greedy algorithm, as well as a more efficient randomized variant of the algorithm, which enjoy approximation guarantees at solving the problem. Experiments on synthetic and real-world data from several applications in medical diagnosis illustrate our theoretical findings and demonstrate that, under human assistance, supervised learning models trained to operate under different automation levels can outperform those trained for full automation as well as humans operating alone.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers15
- Differentiable Learning Under TriageNastaran Okati, Abir De, Manuel Gomez-RodriguezNeurIPS 2021 · 99 citations
- Improving Expert Predictions with Conformal PredictionEleni Straitouri, Lequn Wang, Nastaran Okati, Manuel Gomez RodriguezICML 2023 · 56 citations
- Realizable H-Consistent and Bayes-Consistent Loss Functions for Learning to DeferAnqi Mao, Mehryar Mohri, Yutao ZhongNeurIPS 2024 · 37 citations
- In Defense of Softmax Parametrization for Calibrated and Consistent Learning to DeferYuzhou Cao, Hussein Mozannar, Lei Feng, Hongxin Wei et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 36 citations
- Learning to Defer with Limited Expert PredictionsPatrick Hemmer, Lukas Thede, Michael Vössing, Johannes Jakubik et al.AAAI 2023 · 28 citations
Builds on3
- Consistent Estimators for Learning to Defer to an ExpertHussein Mozannar, David A. SontagICML 2020 · 267 citations
- Regression under Human AssistanceAbir De, Paramita Koley, Niloy Ganguly, Manuel Gomez-RodriguezAAAI 2020 · 73 citations
- Generalized ODIN: Detecting Out-of-Distribution Image Without Learning From Out-of-Distribution DataYen-Chang Hsu, Yilin Shen, Hongxia Jin, Zsolt KiraCVPR 2020
Related papers
- Towards Human-AI Complementarity with Prediction SetsGiovanni De Toni, Nastaran Okati, Suhas Thejaswi, Eleni Straitouri et al.NeurIPS 2024
- Human Assisted Learning by Evolutionary Multi-Objective OptimizationDan-Xuan Liu, Xin Mu, Chao QianAAAI 2023 · 9 citations
- Automated Mechanism Design for Classification with Partial VerificationHanrui Zhang, Yu Cheng, Vincent ConitzerAAAI 2021 · 13 citations
- Decisions, Counterfactual Explanations and Strategic BehaviorStratis Tsirtsis, Manuel Gomez RodriguezNeurIPS 2020 · 75 citations
- Learning Human-Compatible Representations for Case-Based Decision SupportHan Liu, Yizhou Tian, Chacha Chen, Shi Feng et al.ICLR 2023
