What Does the Server See- Understanding Privacy Leakage from Large Language Models in Split Inference
Mingyuan Fan, Yu Liu, Fuyi Wang, Cen Chen
Abstract
The deployment of large language models (LLMs) on resource-constrained devices remains challenging, spurring interest in split inference, where models are partitioned between client and server to reduce computational burden and enhance privacy by transmitting only intermediate activations. However, the privacy-preserving capabilities of split inference, particularly in the context of LLMs, have not been exhaustively investigated. To fill this gap, we introduce ActInv, which solves an intermediate activation matching problem to reconstruct the client's input. Extensive evaluations demonstrate that ActInv achieves high-fidelity reconstructions, even in the presence of common perturbation-based defenses such as Gaussian noise injection and activation sparsification. To systematically understand this vulnerability, we develop Perturbation Amplification Factor (PAF), a metric for quantifying a layer's inherent resistance to reconstruction. Our analysis reveals that privacy vulnerability is not uniform across layers, with some layers being highly susceptible to leakage while others offer natural resistance. Furthermore, we demonstrate that defense effectiveness can be significantly improved by calibrating perturbation directions to maximize reconstruction error during backpropagation. Building on these insights, we design PriPert and conduct comprehensive evaluations, covering privacy, utility, and computational overhead, to demonstrate its effectiveness.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 5a510672-3856-4f3d-859d-0ca2a8ff41f0Builds on17
- Extracting Training Data from Large Language ModelsNicholas Carlini, Florian Tramèr, Eric Wallace, Matthew Jagielski et al.USENIX Security 2021 · 2,866 citations
- LLM-Pruner: On the Structural Pruning of Large Language ModelsXinyin Ma, Gongfan Fang, Xinchao WangNeurIPS 2023 · 994 citations
- Identifying the Risks of LM Agents with an LM-Emulated SandboxYangjun Ruan, Honghua Dong, Andrew Wang, Silviu Pitis et al.ICLR 2024 · 292 citations
- Beyond Memorization: Violating Privacy via Inference with Large Language ModelsRobin Staab, Mark Vero, Mislav Balunovic, Martin T. VechevICLR 2024 · 211 citations
- Quantifying Memorization Across Neural Language ModelsNicholas Carlini, Daphne Ippolito, Matthew Jagielski, Katherine Lee et al.ICLR 2023 · 158 citations
Related papers
- Prompt Inference Attack on Distributed Large Language Model Inference FrameworksXinjian Luo, Ting Yu, Xiaokui XiaoCCS 2025
- PrivSplit: A Lossless Method for Prompt Privacy in Distributed Parameter-Efficient Fine-TuningWujia Niu, Lan Zhang, Haoran Cheng, Shen LiWWW 2026
- InfoDecom: Decomposing Information for Defending Against Privacy Leakage in Split InferenceRuijun Deng, Zhihui Lu, Qiang DuanAAAI 2026
- Split-and-Denoise: Protect large language model inference with local differential privacyPeihua Mai, Ran Yan, Zhe Huang, Youjia Yang et al.ICML 2024 · 41 citations
- What Your Features Reveal: Data-Efficient Black-Box Feature Inversion Attack for Split DNNsZhihan Ren, Lijun He, Jiaxi Liang, Xinzhu Fu et al.CVPR 2026 · 2 citations
