'Ohhh, he's the boss!': Unpacking Power Dynamics Among Developers, Designers, and End-Users in FLOSS Usability
Jazlyn Hellman, Itai Epstein, Jinghui Cheng, Jin L. C. Guo
Abstract
Addressing usability in free, libre, and open-source software (FLOSS) is a challenging issue, particularly due to a long-existing ''by developer, for developer'' mentality. Engaging designers and end-users to work with developers can help improve its usability, but unequal power dynamics among those stakeholder roles must be mitigated. To explore how the power of different FLOSS stakeholders manifests and can be mediated during collaboration, we conducted eight design workshops with different combinations of key FLOSS stakeholders (i.e., developers, designers, and end-users). Leveraging existing theories on Dimensions of Power, we revealed how participants navigate existing role-based power structures through resource utilization, knowledge gap management, and experience referencing. We also observed that participants exhibited diverse behaviors confirming and challenging the status quo of FLOSS usability. Overall, our results contribute to a comprehensive understanding of the power dynamics among FLOSS stakeholders, providing valuable insights into ways to balance their power to improve FLOSS usability. Our work also serves as an exemplar of using design workshops as a research method to study power dynamics during collaboration that are usually hidden in the field.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 59fee1ab-3c7a-4aa9-b897-325122463a75Cited by top-tier papers2
- "It's Just a Wild, Wild West": Harnessing Public Procurement as an AI Governance MechanismAnna Ida Hudig, Emma Kallina, Jatinder SinghCHI 2026 · 2 citations
- Twitch Third-Party Developers’ Support Seeking and Provision Practices on DiscordJie Cai, He Zhang, Yueyan Liu, John M. Carroll et al.CSCW 2026
Builds on11
- Negotiating sustainable futures in communities through participatory speculative design and experiments in livingSimran Chopra, Rachel Elizabeth Clarke, Adrian K. Clear, Sara Heitlinger et al.CHI 2022 · 78 citations
- Keeping Community in the Loop: Understanding Wikipedia Stakeholder Values for Machine Learning-Based SystemsC. Estelle Smith, Bowen Yu, Anjali Srivastava, Aaron Halfaker et al.CHI 2020 · 77 citations
- The Labor of Maintaining and Scaling Free and Open-Source Software ProjectsR. Stuart Geiger, Dorothy Howard, Lilly IraniCSCW 2021 · 49 citations
- Whose Knowledge is Valued? Epistemic Injustice in CSCW ApplicationsLeah Hope Ajmani, Jasmine C. Foriest, Jordan Taylor, Kyle Pittman et al.CSCW 2024 · 29 citations
- ArguLens: Anatomy of Community Opinions On Usability Issues Using Argumentation ModelsWenting Wang, Deeksha M. Arya, Nicole Novielli, Jinghui Cheng et al.CHI 2020 · 29 citations
Related papers
- What If We Work Together? Fostering Reflections on Designer Inclusion in Open Source Software Through Speculative DesignRozhan Hozhabri Nezhad, Jin L.C. Guo, Jinghui ChengCSCW 2026
- Who is to Blame: A Comprehensive Review of Challenges and Opportunities in Designer-Developer CollaborationShutong Zhang, Tianyu Zhang, Jinghui Cheng, Shurui ZhouCSCW 2025 · 6 citations
- Design Tensions in Online Freelancing Platforms: Using Speculative Participatory Design to Support Freelancers' Relationships with ClientsJessica Huang, Ning F. Ma, Veronica A. Rivera, Tabreek Somani et al.CSCW 2024 · 9 citations
- From Fitting Participation to Forging Relationships: The Art of Participatory MLNed Cooper, Alexandra ZafirogluCHI 2024 · 17 citations
- Characterizing Usability Issue Discussions in Open Source Software ProjectsArghavan Sanei, Jinghui ChengCSCW 2024 · 5 citations
