FIZZ: Factual Inconsistency Detection by Zoom-in Summary and Zoom-out Document
Joonho Yang, Seunghyun Yoon, Byeongjeong Kim, Hwanhee Lee
Abstract
Through the advent of pre-trained language models, there have been notable advancements in abstractive summarization systems. Simultaneously, a considerable number of novel methods for evaluating factual consistency in abstractive summarization systems has been developed. But these evaluation approaches incorporate substantial limitations, especially on refinement and interpretability. In this work, we propose highly effective and interpretable factual inconsistency detection method FIZZ (Factual Inconsistency Detection by Zoom-in Summary and Zoom-out Document) for abstractive summarization systems that is based on fine-grained atomic facts decomposition. Moreover, we align atomic facts decomposed from the summary with the source document through adaptive granularity expansion. These atomic facts represent a more fine-grained unit of information, facilitating detailed understanding and interpretability of the summary's factual inconsistency. Experimental results demonstrate that our proposed factual consistency checking system significantly outperforms existing systems. We release the code at https://github.com/plm3332/FIZZ .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers3
- Learning to Reason for Hallucination Span DetectionHsuan Su, Ting-Yao Hu, Hema Swetha Koppula, Kundan Krishna et al.ICLR 2026 · 8 citations
- Stress Testing Factual Consistency Metrics for Long-Document SummarizationZain Muhammad Mujahid, Dustin Wright, Isabelle AugensteinACL 2026 · 1 citation
- Extractive Fact Decomposition for Interpretable Natural Language Inference in one Forward PassNicholas Popovic, Michael FärberEMNLP 2025 · 1 citation
Builds on15
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTTianyi Zhang, Varsha Kishore, Felix Wu, Kilian Q. Weinberger et al.ICLR 2020 · 8,443 citations
- Adversarial NLI: A New Benchmark for Natural Language UnderstandingYixin Nie, Adina Williams, Emily Dinan, Mohit Bansal et al.ACL 2020 · 602 citations
- FActScore: Fine-grained Atomic Evaluation of Factual Precision in Long Form Text GenerationSewon Min, Kalpesh Krishna, Xinxi Lyu, Mike Lewis et al.EMNLP 2023 · 225 citations
- FEQA: A Question Answering Evaluation Framework for Faithfulness Assessment in Abstractive SummarizationEsin Durmus, He He, Mona T. DiabACL 2020 · 90 citations
Related papers
- Fine-grained Factual Consistency Assessment for Abstractive Summarization ModelsSen Zhang, Jianwei Niu, Chuyuan WeiEMNLP 2021 · 8 citations
- Multi-Fact Correction in Abstractive Text SummarizationYue Dong, Shuohang Wang, Zhe Gan, Yu Cheng et al.EMNLP 2020 · 99 citations
- Asking and Answering Questions to Evaluate the Factual Consistency of SummariesAlex Wang, Kyunghyun Cho, Mike LewisACL 2020 · 317 citations
- Improving Factual Consistency of Abstractive Summarization via Question AnsweringFeng Nan, Cícero Nogueira dos Santos, Henghui Zhu, Patrick Ng et al.ACL 2021
- Questioning the Validity of Summarization Datasets and Improving Their Factual ConsistencyYanzhu Guo, Chloé Clavel, Moussa Kamal Eddine, Michalis VazirgiannisEMNLP 2022 · 5 citations
