Invariance Learning in Deep Neural Networks with Differentiable Laplace Approximations
Alexander Immer, Tycho F. A. van der Ouderaa, Gunnar Rätsch, Vincent Fortuin, Mark van der Wilk
Abstract
Data augmentation is commonly applied to improve performance of deep learning by enforcing the knowledge that certain transformations on the input preserve the output. Currently, the data augmentation parameters are chosen by human effort and costly cross-validation, which makes it cumbersome to apply to new datasets. We develop a convenient gradient-based method for selecting the data augmentation without validation data during training of a deep neural network. Our approach relies on phrasing data augmentation as an invariance in the prior distribution on the functions of a neural network, which allows us to learn it using Bayesian model selection. This has been shown to work in Gaussian processes, but not yet for deep neural networks. We propose a differentiable Kronecker-factored Laplace approximation to the marginal likelihood as our objective, which can be optimised without human supervision or validation data. We show that our method can successfully recover invariances present in the data, and that this improves generalisation and data efficiency on image datasets.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 59dd4cf8-c5df-41ff-9311-dfa95d27c421Cited by top-tier papers24
- Bayesian Model Selection, the Marginal Likelihood, and GeneralizationSanae Lotfi, Pavel Izmailov, Gregory W. Benton, Micah Goldblum et al.ICML 2022 · 83 citations
- Kronecker-Factored Approximate Curvature for Modern Neural Network ArchitecturesRuna Eschenhagen, Alexander Immer, Richard E. Turner, Frank Schneider et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 62 citations
- Relaxing Equivariance Constraints with Non-stationary Continuous FiltersTycho F. A. van der Ouderaa, David W. Romero, Mark van der WilkNeurIPS 2022 · 51 citations
- Effective Bayesian Heteroscedastic Regression with Deep Neural NetworksAlexander Immer, Emanuele Palumbo, Alexander Marx, Julia E. VogtNeurIPS 2023 · 34 citations
- Learning Probabilistic Symmetrization for Architecture Agnostic EquivarianceJinwoo Kim, Dat Nguyen, Ayhan Suleymanzade, Hyeokjun An et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 32 citations
Builds on10
- Laplace Redux - Effortless Bayesian Deep LearningErik A. Daxberger, Agustinus Kristiadi, Alexander Immer, Runa Eschenhagen et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 508 citations
- How Good is the Bayes Posterior in Deep Neural Networks Really?Florian Wenzel, Kevin Roth, Bastiaan S. Veeling, Jakub Swiatkowski et al.ICML 2020 · 409 citations
- Geometric and Physical Quantities improve E(3) Equivariant Message PassingJohannes Brandstetter, Rob Hesselink, Elise van der Pol, Erik J. Bekkers et al.ICLR 2022 · 307 citations
- MDP Homomorphic Networks: Group Symmetries in Reinforcement LearningElise van der Pol, Daniel E. Worrall, Herke van Hoof, Frans A. Oliehoek et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 203 citations
- Scalable Marginal Likelihood Estimation for Model Selection in Deep LearningAlexander Immer, Matthias Bauer, Vincent Fortuin, Gunnar Rätsch et al.ICML 2021 · 130 citations
Related papers
- Learning Layer-wise Equivariances Automatically using GradientsTycho F. A. van der Ouderaa, Alexander Immer, Mark van der WilkNeurIPS 2023 · 28 citations
- Learning Augmentation Network via Influence FunctionsDonghoon Lee, Hyunsin Park, Trung X. Pham, Chang D. YooCVPR 2020
- Optimizing Data Augmentation through Bayesian Model SelectionMadi Matymov, Ba-Hien Tran, Michael Kampffmeyer, Markus Heinonen et al.ICLR 2026 · 1 citation
- A Group-Theoretic Framework for Data AugmentationShuxiao Chen, Edgar Dobriban, Jane H. LeeNeurIPS 2020 · 254 citations
- AdaTransform: Adaptive Data TransformationZhiqiang Tang, Xi Peng, Tingfeng Li, Yizhe Zhu et al.ICCV 2019 · 20 citations
