Tail Modulo Cons, OCaml, and Relational Separation Logic
Clément Allain, Frédéric Bour, Basile Clément, François Pottier, Gabriel Scherer
Abstract
Common functional languages incentivize tail-recursive functions, as opposed to general recursive functions that consume stack space and may not scale to large inputs. This distinction occasionally requires writing functions in a tail-recursive style that may be more complex and slower than the natural, non-tail-recursive definition. This work describes our implementation of the tail modulo constructor (TMC) transformation in the OCaml compiler, an optimization that provides stack-efficiency for a larger class of functions — tail-recursive modulo constructors — which includes in particular the natural definition of List.map and many similar recursive data-constructing functions. We prove the correctness of this program transformation in a simplified setting — a small untyped calculus — that captures the salient aspects of the OCaml implementation. Our proof is mechanized in the Coq proof assistant, using the Iris base logic. An independent contribution of our work is an extension of the Simuliris approach to define simulation relations that support different calling conventions. To our knowledge, this is the first use of Simuliris to prove the correctness of a compiler transformation.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 59dc279d-8cde-4aef-bfe7-375200d4dcbfCited by top-tier papers3
- A Relational Separation Logic for Effect HandlersPaulo Emílio de Vilhena, Simcha van Collem, Ines Wright, Robbert KrebbersPOPL 2026 · 3 citations
- KEM-IND-CCA-Preserving Compilation of Jasmin's ML-KEMSantiago Arranz-Olmos, Gilles Barthe, Lionel Blatter, Benjamin Gregoire et al.CCS 2026 · 1 citation
- Backwards-Compatible Row-Based Exceptions in MLSimcha van Collem, Paulo Emílio de Vilhena, Robbert KrebbersPLDI 2026
Builds on6
- Simuliris: a separation logic framework for verifying concurrent program optimizationsLennard Gäher, Michael Sammler, Simon Spies, Ralf Jung et al.POPL 2022 · 33 citations
- Transfinite Iris: resolving an existential dilemma of step-indexed separation logicSimon Spies, Lennard Gäher, Daniel Gratzer, Joseph Tassarotti et al.PLDI 2021 · 32 citations
- A separation logic for effect handlersPaulo Emílio de Vilhena, François PottierPOPL 2021 · 24 citations
- Melocoton: A Program Logic for Verified Interoperability Between OCaml and CArmaël Guéneau, Johannes Hostert, Simon Spies, Michael Sammler et al.OOPSLA 2023 · 10 citations
- Tail Recursion Modulo Context: An Equational ApproachDaan Leijen, Anton LorenzenPOPL 2023 · 9 citations
Related papers
- Actris: session-type based reasoning in separation logicJonas Kastberg Hinrichsen, Jesper Bengtson, Robbert KrebbersPOPL 2020 · 44 citations
- Pyrosome: Verified Compilation for Modular MetatheoryDustin Jamner, Gabriel Kammer, Ritam Nag, Adam ChlipalaOOPSLA 2025
- Compiling with continuations, correctlyZoe Paraskevopoulou, Anvay GroverOOPSLA 2021 · 10 citations
- Program Logics à la CarteMax Vistrup, Michael Sammler, Ralf JungPOPL 2025 · 4 citations
- Type Inference LogicsDenis Carnier, François Pottier, Steven KeuchelOOPSLA 2024 · 3 citations
