Avoiding Side Effects By Considering Future Tasks
Victoria Krakovna, Laurent Orseau, Richard Ngo, Miljan Martic, Shane Legg
Abstract
Designing reward functions is difficult: the designer has to specify what to do (what it means to complete the task) as well as what not to do (side effects that should be avoided while completing the task). To alleviate the burden on the reward designer, we propose an algorithm to automatically generate an auxiliary reward function that penalizes side effects. This auxiliary objective rewards the ability to complete possible future tasks, which decreases if the agent causes side effects during the current task. The future task reward can also give the agent an incentive to interfere with events in the environment that make future tasks less achievable, such as irreversible actions by other agents. To avoid this interference incentive, we introduce a baseline policy that represents a default course of action (such as doing nothing), and use it to filter out future tasks that are not achievable by default. We formally define interference incentives and show that the future task approach with a baseline policy avoids these incentives in the deterministic case. Using gridworld environments that test for side effects and interference, we show that our method avoids interference and is more effective for avoiding side effects than the common approach of penalizing irreversible actions.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers4
- The Limits of Inference Scaling Through ResamplingBenedikt Stroebl, Sayash Kapoor, Arvind NarayananICLR 2026 · 38 citations
- Path-Specific Objectives for Safer Agent IncentivesSebastian Farquhar, Ryan Carey, Tom EverittAAAI 2022 · 30 citations
- Quantifying the Sensitivity of Inverse Reinforcement Learning to MisspecificationJoar Max Viktor Skalse, Alessandro AbateICLR 2024 · 5 citations
- Calibrating Conservatism for Scalable OversightWilliam Overman, Mohsen BayatiICML 2026
Related papers
- Behavior Alignment via Reward Function OptimizationDhawal Gupta, Yash Chandak, Scott M. Jordan, Philip S. Thomas et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 27 citations
- Avoiding Side Effects in Complex EnvironmentsAlexander Matt Turner, Neale Ratzlaff, Prasad TadepalliNeurIPS 2020 · 40 citations
- Admissible Policy Teaching through Reward DesignKiarash Banihashem, Adish Singla, Jiarui Gan, Goran RadanovicAAAI 2022 · 18 citations
- Querying to Find a Safe Policy under Uncertain Safety Constraints in Markov Decision ProcessesShun Zhang, Edmund H. Durfee, Satinder SinghAAAI 2020 · 6 citations
- On the Expressivity of Markov RewardDavid Abel, Will Dabney, Anna Harutyunyan, Mark K. Ho et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 107 citations
