Sample Efficient Toeplitz Covariance Estimation
Yonina C. Eldar, Jerry Li, Cameron Musco, Christopher Musco
Abstract
We study the sample complexity of estimating the covariance matrix T of a distribution D over d-dimensional vectors, under the assumption that T is Toeplitz. This assumption arises in many signal processing problems, where the covariance between any two measurements only depends on the time or distance between those measurements. 1 We are interested in estimation strategies that may choose to view only a subset of entries in each vector sample x ∼ D, which often equates to reducing hardware and communication requirements in applications ranging from wireless signal processing to advanced imaging. Our goal is to minimize both 1) the number of vector samples drawn from D and 2) the number of entries accessed in each sample.
We provide some of the first non-asymptotic bounds on these sample complexity measures that exploit T 's Toeplitz structure, and by doing so, significantly improve on results for generic covariance matrices. These bounds follow from a novel analysis of classical and widely used estimation algorithms (along with some new variants), including methods based on selecting entries from each vector sample according to a so-called sparse ruler.
In addition to results that hold for any Toeplitz T , we further study the important setting when T is close to low-rank, which is often the case in practice. We show that methods based on sparse rulers perform even better in this setting, with sample complexity scaling sublinearly in d. Motivated by this finding, we develop a new covariance estimation strategy that further improves on existing methods in the low-rank case: when T is rank-k or nearly rank-k, it achieves sample complexity depending polynomially on k and only logarithmically on d.
Our results utilize tools from random matrix sketching, leverage score based sampling techniques for continuous time signals, and sparse Fourier transform methods. In many cases, we pair our upper bounds with matching or nearly matching lower bounds.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 59adb224-53de-4d2d-9ef4-413f6a230ec9Cited by top-tier papers6
- Fourier Sparse Leverage Scores and Approximate Kernel LearningTamás Erdélyi, Cameron Musco, Christopher MuscoNeurIPS 2020 · 28 citations
- Fast Regression for Structured InputsRaphael A. Meyer, Cameron Musco, Christopher Musco, David P. Woodruff et al.ICLR 2022 · 14 citations
- Near-Linear Sample Complexity for Lp Polynomial RegressionRaphael A. Meyer, Cameron Musco, Christopher Musco, David P. Woodruff et al.SODA 2023 · 3 citations
- Sublinear Time Low-Rank Approximation of Hankel MatricesMichael Kapralov, Cameron Musco, Kshiteej ShethSODA 2026 · 1 citation
- Toeplitz Low-Rank Approximation with Sublinear Query ComplexityMichael Kapralov, Hannah Lawrence, Mikhail Makarov, Cameron Musco et al.SODA 2023 · 1 citation
Related papers
- Sublinear Time Low-Rank Approximation of Toeplitz MatricesCameron Musco, Kshiteej ShethSODA 2024 · 1 citation
- Algorithms for heavy-tailed statistics: regression, covariance estimation, and beyondYeshwanth Cherapanamjeri, Samuel B. Hopkins, Tarun Kathuria, Prasad Raghavendra et al.STOC 2020 · 2 citations
- Tight Sampling Bounds for Eigenvalue ApproximationWilliam Swartworth, David P. WoodruffSODA 2025
- Feature Adaptation for Sparse Linear RegressionJonathan A. Kelner, Frederic Koehler, Raghu Meka, Dhruv RohatgiNeurIPS 2023 · 9 citations
- Coherence-free Entrywise Estimation of Eigenvectors in Low-rank Signal-plus-noise Matrix ModelsHao Yan, Keith LevinNeurIPS 2024 · 2 citations
