AMPO: Active Multi Preference Optimization for Self-play Preference Selection
Taneesh Gupta, Rahul Madhavan, Xuchao Zhang, Chetan Bansal, Saravan Rajmohan
Abstract
Multi-preference optimization enriches languagemodel alignment beyond pairwise preferences by contrasting entire sets of helpful and undesired responses, enabling richer training signals for large language models. During self-play alignment, these models often produce numerous candidate answers per query, making it computationally infeasible to include all of them in the training objective. We propose Active Multi-Preference Optimization (AMPO), which combines on-policy generation, a multi-preference group-contrastive loss, and active subset selection. Specifically, we score and embed large candidate pools of responses, then pick a small but informative subset-covering reward extremes and distinct semantic clusters-for preference optimization. The resulting contrastive training scheme identifies not only the best and worst answers but also subtle, underexplored modes crucial for robust alignment. Theoretically, we provide guarantees of expected reward maximization using our active selection method. Empirically, AMPO achieves state-of-the-art results on AlpacaEval with Llama 8B and Mistral 7B. We release our datasets here. * Equal contribution 1 Microsoft 2 IISc, Bangalore. Correspon-Gradient Updates
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 599edb36-ad17-43ec-92a7-4b038b5cedabBuilds on21
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Big Self-Supervised Models are Strong Semi-Supervised LearnersTing Chen, Simon Kornblith, Kevin Swersky, Mohammad Norouzi et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 2,611 citations
- Model Alignment as Prospect Theoretic OptimizationKawin Ethayarajh, Winnie Xu, Niklas Muennighoff, Dan Jurafsky et al.ICML 2024 · 973 citations
- Self-Play Fine-Tuning Converts Weak Language Models to Strong Language ModelsZixiang Chen, Yihe Deng, Huizhuo Yuan, Kaixuan Ji et al.ICML 2024 · 527 citations
Related papers
- Self-Boosting Large Language Models with Synthetic Preference DataQingxiu Dong, Li Dong, Xingxing Zhang, Zhifang Sui et al.ICLR 2025
- Less is More: Improving LLM Alignment via Preference Data SelectionXun Deng, Han Zhong, Rui Ai, Fuli Feng et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 4 citations
- Temporal Self-Rewarding Language Models: Decoupling Chosen-Rejected via Past-FutureYidong Wang, Xin Wang, Cunxiang Wang, Junfeng Fang et al.ICML 2026 · 3 citations
- Self-Play Preference Optimization for Language Model AlignmentYue Wu, Zhiqing Sun, Huizhuo Yuan, Kaixuan Ji et al.ICLR 2025
- RE-PO: Robust Enhanced Policy Optimization as a General Framework for LLM AlignmentXiaoyang Cao, Zelai Xu, Mo Guang, Kaiwen Long et al.ICLR 2026 · 4 citations
