Sample Efficient Learning of Predictors that Complement Humans
Mohammad-Amin Charusaie, Hussein Mozannar, David A. Sontag, Samira Samadi
Abstract
One of the goals of learning algorithms is to complement and reduce the burden on human decision makers. The expert deferral setting wherein an algorithm can either predict on its own or defer the decision to a downstream expert helps accomplish this goal. A fundamental aspect of this setting is the need to learn complementary predictors that improve on the human's weaknesses rather than learning predictors optimized for average error. In this work, we provide the first theoretical analysis of the benefit of learning complementary predictors in expert deferral. To enable efficiently learning such predictors, we consider a family of consistent surrogate loss functions for expert deferral and analyze their theoretical properties. Finally, we design active learning schemes that require minimal amount of data of human expert predictions in order to learn accurate deferral systems. * Equal Contribution.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 594a4614-3f97-4f38-85e9-5a7d5bea359dCited by top-tier papers24
- Two-Stage Learning to Defer with Multiple ExpertsAnqi Mao, Christopher Mohri, Mehryar Mohri, Yutao ZhongNeurIPS 2023 · 98 citations
- When Does Confidence-Based Cascade Deferral Suffice?Wittawat Jitkrittum, Neha Gupta, Aditya Krishna Menon, Harikrishna Narasimhan et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 76 citations
- Generalizing Consistent Multi-Class Classification with Rejection to be Compatible with Arbitrary LossesYuzhou Cao, Tianchi Cai, Lei Feng, Lihong Gu et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 42 citations
- Realizable H-Consistent and Bayes-Consistent Loss Functions for Learning to DeferAnqi Mao, Mehryar Mohri, Yutao ZhongNeurIPS 2024 · 37 citations
- In Defense of Softmax Parametrization for Calibrated and Consistent Learning to DeferYuzhou Cao, Hussein Mozannar, Lei Feng, Hongxin Wei et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 36 citations
Builds on8
- A Human-Centered Evaluation of a Deep Learning System Deployed in Clinics for the Detection of Diabetic RetinopathyEmma Beede, Elizabeth Elliott Baylor, Fred Hersch, Anna Iurchenko et al.CHI 2020 · 589 citations
- Consistent Estimators for Learning to Defer to an ExpertHussein Mozannar, David A. SontagICML 2020 · 267 citations
- "Why is 'Chicago' deceptive?" Towards Building Model-Driven Tutorials for HumansVivian Lai, Han Liu, Chenhao TanCHI 2020 · 113 citations
- Differentiable Learning Under TriageNastaran Okati, Abir De, Manuel Gomez-RodriguezNeurIPS 2021 · 99 citations
- Combining Human Predictions with Model Probabilities via Confusion Matrices and CalibrationGavin Kerrigan, Padhraic Smyth, Mark SteyversNeurIPS 2021 · 79 citations
Related papers
- Exploiting Human-AI Dependence for Learning to DeferZixi Wei, Yuzhou Cao, Lei FengICML 2024 · 15 citations
- Mastering Multiple-Expert Routing: Realizable H-Consistency and Strong Guarantees for Learning to DeferAnqi Mao, Mehryar Mohri, Yutao ZhongICML 2025
- Regression with Multi-Expert DeferralAnqi Mao, Mehryar Mohri, Yutao ZhongICML 2024 · 31 citations
- Learning to Defer with Limited Expert PredictionsPatrick Hemmer, Lukas Thede, Michael Vössing, Johannes Jakubik et al.AAAI 2023 · 28 citations
- Post-hoc estimators for learning to defer to an expertHarikrishna Narasimhan, Wittawat Jitkrittum, Aditya Krishna Menon, Ankit Singh Rawat et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 66 citations
