USENIX Security2023Top-tier venue
A Research Framework and Initial Study of Browser Security for the Visually Impaired
Elaine Lau, Zachary Peterson
Abstract
The growth of web-based malware and phishing attacks has catalyzed significant advances in the research and use of interstitial warning pages and modals by a browser prior to loading the content of a suspect site. These warnings commonly use visual cues to attract users' attention, including specialized iconography, color, and the placement and size of buttons to communicate the importance of the scenario. While the efficacy of visual techniques has improved safety for sighted users, these techniques are unsuitable for blind and visually impaired users. We attribute this not to a lack of interest or technical capability by browser manufactures, where universal design is a core tenet of their engineering practices, but instead a reflection of the very real dearth of research literature to inform their choices, exacerbated by a deficit of clear methodologies for conducting studies with this population. Indeed, the challenges are manifold. In this paper, we analyze and address the methodological challenges of conducting security and privacy research with a visually impaired population, and contribute a new set of methodological best practices when conducting a study of this kind. Using our methodology, we conduct a preliminary study analyzing the experiences of the visually impaired with browser security warnings, perform a thematic analysis identifying common challenges visually impaired users experience, and present some initial solutions that could improve security for this population.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers4
- Understanding How to Inform Blind and Low-Vision Users about Data Privacy through Privacy Question Answering AssistantsYuanyuan Feng, Abhilasha Ravichander, Yaxing Yao, Shikun Zhang et al.USENIX Security 2024 · 9 citations
- Assessing Suspicious Emails with Banner Warnings Among Blind and Low-Vision Users in Realistic SettingsFilipo Sharevski, Aziz ZeidiehUSENIX Security 2024 · 7 citations
- On the (In)Security of Loading Machine Learning ModelsGabriele Digregorio, Marco Di Gennaro, Stefano Zanero, Stefano Longari et al.S&P 2026 · 3 citations
- Broken Access: On the Challenges of Screen Reader Assisted Two-Factor and Passwordless AuthenticationMd Mojibur Rahman Redoy Akanda, Ahmed Tanvir Mahdad, Nitesh SaxenaWWW 2025
Related papers
- Design and Evaluation of Inclusive Email Security Indicators for People with Visual ImpairmentsYaman Yu, Saidivya Ashok, Smirity Kaushik, Yang Wang et al.S&P 2023
- (Blind) Users Really Do Heed Aural Telephone Scam WarningsFilipo Sharevski, Jennifer Vander Loop, Bill Evans, Alexander PonticelloS&P 2025
- Emoji Accessibility for Visually Impaired PeopleGarreth W. Tigwell, Benjamin M. Gorman, Rachel MenziesCHI 2020 · 41 citations
- SoK: Inaccessible & Insecure: An Exposition of Authentication Challenges Faced by Blind and Visually Impaired Users in State-of-the-Art Academic ProposalsMd Mojibur Rahman Redoy Akanda, Amanda Lacy, Nitesh SaxenaUSENIX Security 2025
- Defining Patterns for a Conversational WebEmanuele Pucci, Isabella Possaghi, Claudia Maria Cutrupi, Marcos Báez et al.CHI 2023 · 29 citations
