Principled Data-Driven Decision Support for Cyber-Forensic Investigations
Soodeh Atefi, Sakshyam Panda, Emmanouil Panaousis, Aron Laszka
Abstract
In the wake of a cybersecurity incident, it is crucial to promptly discover how the threat actors breached security in order to assess the impact of the incident and to develop and deploy countermeasures that can protect against further attacks. To this end, defenders can launch a cyber-forensic investigation, which discovers the techniques that the threat actors used in the incident. A fundamental challenge in such an investigation is prioritizing the investigation of particular techniques since the investigation of each technique requires time and effort, but forensic analysts cannot know which ones were actually used before investigating them. To ensure prompt discovery, it is imperative to provide decision support that can help forensic analysts with this prioritization. A recent study demonstrated that data-driven decision support, based on a dataset of prior incidents, can provide stateof-the-art prioritization. However, this data-driven approach, called DISCLOSE, is based on a heuristic that utilizes only a subset of the available information and does not approximate optimal decisions. To improve upon this heuristic, we introduce a principled approach for data-driven decision support for cyber-forensic investigations. We formulate the decisionsupport problem using a Markov decision process, whose states represent the states of a forensic investigation. To solve the decision problem, we propose a Monte Carlo tree search based method, which relies on a k-NN regression over prior incidents to estimate state-transition probabilities. We evaluate our proposed approach on multiple versions of the MITRE ATT&CK dataset, which is a knowledge base of adversarial techniques and tactics based on real-world cyber incidents, and demonstrate that our approach outperforms DISCLOSE in terms of techniques discovered per effort spent. Model and Problem Formulation To formally define the problem of providing optimal decision support for cyber forensics, we first introduce fundamental assumptions and notations for the key elements of
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 58d592e0-c476-48e9-8a56-7da61cc1ccfdBuilds on4
- SLEUTH: Real-time Attack Scenario Reconstruction from COTS Audit DataMd Nahid Hossain, Sadegh M. Milajerdi, Junao Wang, Birhanu Eshete et al.USENIX Security 2017 · 291 citations
- Combating Dependence Explosion in Forensic Analysis Using Alternative Tag Propagation SemanticsMd Nahid Hossain, Sanaz Sheikhi, R. SekarS&P 2020 · 179 citations
- Finding Needles in a Moving Haystack: Prioritizing Alerts with Adversarial Reinforcement LearningLiang Tong, Aron Laszka, Chao Yan, Ning Zhang et al.AAAI 2020 · 27 citations
- OmegaLog: High-Fidelity Attack Investigation via Transparent Multi-layer Log AnalysisWajih Ul Hassan, Mohammad A. Noureddine, Pubali Datta, Adam BatesNDSS 2020
Related papers
- Forecasting Malware Capabilities From Cyber Attack Memory ImagesOmar Alrawi, Moses Ike, Matthew Pruett, Ranjita Pai Kasturi et al.USENIX Security 2021 · 32 citations
- BEAGLE: Forensics of Deep Learning Backdoor Attack for Better DefenseSiyuan Cheng, Guanhong Tao, Yingqi Liu, Shengwei An et al.NDSS 2023
- High Fidelity Data Reduction for Big Data Security Dependency AnalysesZhang Xu, Zhenyu Wu, Zhichun Li, Kangkook Jee et al.CCS 2016 · 197 citations
- Send Hardest Problems My Way: Probabilistic Path Prioritization for Hybrid FuzzingLei Zhao, Yue Duan, Heng Yin, Jifeng XuanNDSS 2019 · 157 citations
- An OS-agnostic Approach to Memory ForensicsAndrea Oliveri, Matteo Dell'Amico, Davide BalzarottiNDSS 2023
