Temporal Preference Optimization for Unsupervised Retrieval
HyunJin Kim, Jaejun Shim, Young Jin Kim, JinYeong Bak
Abstract
Unsupervised dense retrievers offer scalability by learning semantic similarity from unlabeled documents via contrastive learning, but they struggle to capture the temporal relevance, retrieving semantically related but temporally misaligned documents-an important aspect when a document collection spans multiple time periods (e.g., retrieving documents from 2018-2025 for "Who is the president in 2019?" introduces temporal ambiguity). Existing methods rely on supervised training with explicit timestamps, which are not always feasible. We propose TPOUR (Temporal Preference Optimization for Unsupervised Retriever), which uses our novel training method Temporal Retrieval Preference Optimization (TRPO). TRPO reinterprets preference learning in the temporal dimension, guiding the retriever to favor temporally aligned documents. TPOUR further generalizes to unseen time periods via interpolation in a learned time embedding, enabling continuous temporal alignment. Experiments on temporal information retrieval (T-IR), TPOUR outperforms both unsupervised and supervised baselines. Compared to Qwen-Embedding-8B, despite being about 72.7 smaller, TPOUR Contriever improves average nDCG@5 by +4.04 (+12.15%) on explicit and +4.98 (+15.21%) on implicit queries. We provide our code at https://github.com/agwaBom/TPOUR.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 5891a11f-0ad1-433c-ac20-896cc2fbcbcaBuilds on18
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP TasksPatrick Lewis, Ethan Perez, Aleksandra Piktus, Fabio Petroni et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 19,162 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- SimCSE: Simple Contrastive Learning of Sentence EmbeddingsTianyu Gao, Xingcheng Yao, Danqi ChenEMNLP 2021 · 2,496 citations
- Iterative Preference Learning from Human Feedback: Bridging Theory and Practice for RLHF under KL-constraintWei Xiong, Hanze Dong, Chenlu Ye, Ziqi Wang et al.ICML 2024 · 346 citations
Related papers
- Graded Relevance Scoring of Written Essays with Dense RetrievalSalam Albatarni, Sohaila Eltanbouly, Tamer ElsayedSIGIR 2024 · 4 citations
- COCO-DR: Combating the Distribution Shift in Zero-Shot Dense Retrieval with Contrastive and Distributionally Robust LearningYue Yu, Chenyan Xiong, Si Sun, Chao Zhang et al.EMNLP 2022 · 21 citations
- Precise Zero-Shot Dense Retrieval without Relevance LabelsLuyu Gao, Xueguang Ma, Jimmy Lin, Jamie CallanACL 2023 · 211 citations
- HypeR: Multitask Hyper-Prompted Training Enables Large-Scale Retrieval GeneralizationZefeng Cai, Chongyang Tao, Tao Shen, Can Xu et al.ICLR 2023
- Revela: Dense Retriever Learning via Language ModelingFengyu Cai, Tong Chen, Xinran Zhao, Sihao Chen et al.ICLR 2026 · 3 citations
