Automated Classification of Model Errors on ImageNet
Momchil Peychev, Mark Niklas Müller, Marc Fischer, Martin T. Vechev
Abstract
While the ImageNet dataset has been driving computer vision research over the past decade, significant label noise and ambiguity have made top-1 accuracy an insufficient measure of further progress. To address this, new label-sets and evaluation protocols have been proposed for ImageNet showing that state-of-the-art models already achieve over 95% accuracy and shifting the focus on investigating why the remaining errors persist. Recent work in this direction employed a panel of experts to manually categorize all remaining classification errors for two selected models. However, this process is time-consuming, prone to inconsistencies, and requires trained experts, making it unsuitable for regular model evaluation thus limiting its utility. To overcome these limitations, we propose the first automated error classification framework, a valuable tool to study how modeling choices affect error distributions. We use our framework to comprehensively evaluate the error distribution of over 900 models. Perhaps surprisingly, we find that across model architectures, scales, and pre-training corpora, top-1 accuracy is a strong predictor for the portion of all error types. In particular, we observe that the portion of severe errors drops significantly with top-1 accuracy indicating that, while it underreports a model's true performance, it remains a valuable performance metric. We release all our code at https://github.com/eth-sri/automated-error-analysis .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers3
- Efficient Lifelong Model Evaluation in an Era of Rapid ProgressAmeya Prabhu, Vishaal Udandarao, Philip Torr, Matthias Bethge et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 11 citations
- On Large Multimodal Models as Open-World Image ClassifiersAlessandro Conti, Massimiliano Mancini, Enrico Fini, Yiming Wang et al.ICCV 2025 · 3 citations
- Fine-Grained Erasure in Text-to-Image Diffusion-based Foundation ModelsKartik Thakral, Tamar Glaser, Tal Hassner, Mayank Vatsa et al.CVPR 2025
Builds on17
- Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language SupervisionAlec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh et al.ICML 2021 · 47,906 citations
- Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted WindowsZe Liu, Yutong Lin, Yue Cao, Han Hu et al.ICCV 2021 · 31,683 citations
- An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at ScaleAlexey Dosovitskiy, Lucas Beyer, Alexander Kolesnikov, Dirk Weissenborn et al.ICLR 2021 · 21,477 citations
- A ConvNet for the 2020sZhuang Liu, Hanzi Mao, Chao-Yuan Wu, Christoph Feichtenhofer et al.CVPR 2022 · 6,782 citations
- Do Wide and Deep Networks Learn the Same Things? Uncovering How Neural Network Representations Vary with Width and DepthThao Nguyen, Maithra Raghu, Simon KornblithICLR 2021 · 323 citations
Related papers
- When does dough become a bagel? Analyzing the remaining mistakes on ImageNetVijay Vasudevan, Benjamin Caine, Raphael Gontijo Lopes, Sara Fridovich-Keil et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 79 citations
- Re-Labeling ImageNet: From Single to Multi-Labels, From Global to Localized LabelsSangdoo Yun, Seong Joon Oh, Byeongho Heo, Dongyoon Han et al.CVPR 2021
- Evaluating Machine Accuracy on ImageNetVaishaal Shankar, Rebecca Roelofs, Horia Mania, Alex Fang et al.ICML 2020 · 153 citations
- From ImageNet to Image Classification: Contextualizing Progress on BenchmarksDimitris Tsipras, Shibani Santurkar, Logan Engstrom, Andrew Ilyas et al.ICML 2020 · 146 citations
- Salient ImageNet: How to discover spurious features in Deep Learning?Sahil Singla, Soheil FeiziICLR 2022 · 144 citations
