AutoCATE: End-to-End, Automated Treatment Effect Estimation
Toon Vanderschueren, Tim Verdonck, Mihaela van der Schaar, Wouter Verbeke
Abstract
Estimating causal effects is crucial in domains like healthcare, economics, and education. Despite advances in machine learning (ML) for estimating conditional average treatment effects (CATE), the practical adoption of these methods remains limited, due to the complexities of implementing, tuning, and validating them. To address these challenges, we formalize the search for an optimal ML pipeline for CATE estimation as a counterfactual Combined Algorithm Selection and Hyperparameter (CASH) optimization. We introduce AutoCATE, the first end-to-end, automated solution for CATE estimation. Unlike prior approaches that address only parts of this problem, AutoCATE integrates evaluation, estimation, and ensembling in a unified framework. AutoCATE enables comprehensive comparisons of different protocols, yielding novel insights into CATE estimation and a final configuration that outperforms commonly used strategies. To facilitate broad adoption and further research, we release AutoCATE as an open-source software package.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 5823ae2a-293f-4828-91be-bcec387ede67Builds on6
- Identifying Causal-Effect Inference Failure with Uncertainty-Aware ModelsAndrew Jesson, Sören Mindermann, Uri Shalit, Yarin GalNeurIPS 2020 · 85 citations
- Quantifying Ignorance in Individual-Level Causal-Effect Estimates under Hidden ConfoundingAndrew Jesson, Sören Mindermann, Yarin Gal, Uri ShalitICML 2021 · 66 citations
- Clairvoyance: A Pipeline Toolkit for Medical Time SeriesDaniel Jarrett, Jinsung Yoon, Ioana Bica, Zhaozhi Qian et al.ICLR 2021 · 43 citations
- B-Learner: Quasi-Oracle Bounds on Heterogeneous Causal Effects Under Hidden ConfoundingMiruna Oprescu, Jacob Dorn, Marah Ghoummaid, Andrew Jesson et al.ICML 2023 · 39 citations
- In Search of Insights, Not Magic Bullets: Towards Demystification of the Model Selection Dilemma in Heterogeneous Treatment Effect EstimationAlicia Curth, Mihaela van der SchaarICML 2023 · 36 citations
Related papers
- Empirical Analysis of Model Selection for Heterogeneous Causal Effect EstimationDivyat Mahajan, Ioannis Mitliagkas, Brady Neal, Vasilis SyrgkanisICLR 2024 · 28 citations
- Comparison of meta-learners for estimating multi-valued treatment heterogeneous effectsNaoufal Acharki, Ramiro Lugo, Antoine Bertoncello, Josselin GarnierICML 2023 · 18 citations
- Treatment Effect Estimation for Optimal Decision-MakingDennis Frauen, Valentyn Melnychuk, Jonas Schweisthal, Mihaela van der Schaar et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 8 citations
- Counterfactual Cross-Validation: Stable Model Selection Procedure for Causal Inference ModelsYuta Saito, Shota YasuiICML 2020 · 34 citations
- Measuring Variable Importance in Heterogeneous Treatment Effects with ConfidenceJoseph Paillard, Angel David Reyero Lobo, Vitaliy Kolodyazhniy, Bertrand Thirion et al.ICML 2025
