Spatial-Phase Shallow Learning: Rethinking Face Forgery Detection in Frequency Domain
Honggu Liu, Xiaodan Li, Wenbo Zhou, Yuefeng Chen, Yuan He, Hui Xue, Weiming Zhang, Nenghai Yu
Abstract
The remarkable success in face forgery techniques has received considerable attention in computer vision due to security concerns. We observe that up-sampling is a necessary step of most face forgery techniques, and cumulative up-sampling will result in obvious changes in the frequency domain, especially in the phase spectrum. According to the property of natural images, the phase spectrum preserves abundant frequency components that provide extra information and complement the loss of the amplitude spectrum. To this end, we present a novel Spatial-Phase Shallow Learning (SPSL) method, which combines spatial image and phase spectrum to capture the up-sampling artifacts of face forgery to improve the transferability, for face forgery detection. And we also theoretically analyze the validity of utilizing the phase spectrum. Moreover, we notice that local texture information is more crucial than high-level semantic information for the face forgery detection task. So we reduce the receptive fields by shallowing the network to suppress high-level features and focus on the local region. Extensive experiments show that SPSL can achieve the state-of-the-art performance on cross-datasets evaluation as well as multi-class classification and obtain comparable results on single dataset evaluation.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers86
- Detecting Deepfakes with Self-Blended ImagesKaede Shiohara, Toshihiko YamasakiCVPR 2022 · 366 citations
- End-to-End Reconstruction-Classification Learning for Face Forgery DetectionJunyi Cao, Chao Ma, Taiping Yao, Shen Chen et al.CVPR 2022 · 327 citations
- UCF: Uncovering Common Features for Generalizable Deepfake DetectionZhiyuan Yan, Yong Zhang, Yanbo Fan, Baoyuan WuICCV 2023 · 264 citations
- Leveraging Real Talking Faces via Self-Supervision for Robust Forgery DetectionAlexandros Haliassos, Rodrigo Mira, Stavros Petridis, Maja PanticCVPR 2022 · 138 citations
- TALL: Thumbnail Layout for Deepfake Video DetectionYuting Xu, Jian Liang, Gengyun Jia, Ziming Yang et al.ICCV 2023 · 133 citations
Builds on9
- FaceForensics++: Learning to Detect Manipulated Facial ImagesAndreas Rössler, Davide Cozzolino, Luisa Verdoliva, Christian Riess et al.ICCV 2019 · 2,966 citations
- FSGAN: Subject Agnostic Face Swapping and ReenactmentYuval Nirkin, Yosi Keller, Tal HassnerICCV 2019 · 710 citations
- Sharp Multiple Instance Learning for DeepFake Video DetectionXiaodan Li, Yining Lang, Yuefeng Chen, Xiaofeng Mao et al.ACM MM 2020 · 157 citations
- Face X-Ray for More General Face Forgery DetectionLingzhi Li, Jianmin Bao, Ting Zhang, Hao Yang et al.CVPR 2020
- CNN-Generated Images Are Surprisingly Easy to Spot... for NowSheng-Yu Wang, Oliver Wang, Richard Zhang, Andrew Owens et al.CVPR 2020
Related papers
- Exploring Frequency Adversarial Attacks for Face Forgery DetectionShuai Jia, Chao Ma, Taiping Yao, Bangjie Yin et al.CVPR 2022 · 78 citations
- Exploiting Fine-Grained Face Forgery Clues via Progressive Enhancement LearningQiqi Gu, Shen Chen, Taiping Yao, Yang Chen et al.AAAI 2022 · 187 citations
- Generalizing Face Forgery Detection With High-Frequency FeaturesYuchen Luo, Yong Zhang, Junchi Yan, Wei LiuCVPR 2021
- Frequency-Aware Deepfake Detection: Improving Generalizability through Frequency Space Domain LearningChuangchuang Tan, Yao Zhao, Shikui Wei, Guanghua Gu et al.AAAI 2024 · 232 citations
- SpeechForensics: Audio-Visual Speech Representation Learning for Face Forgery DetectionYachao Liang, Min Yu, Gang Li, Jianguo Jiang et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 19 citations
