Calculational Design of Hyperlogics by Abstract Interpretation
Patrick Cousot, Jeffery Wang
Abstract
PATRICK COUSOT and JEFFERY WANG, CS, Courant Institute of Mathematical Studies, NYU, USA We design various logics for proving hyper properties of iterative programs by application of abstract interpretation principles.
In part I, we design a generic, structural, fixpoint abstract interpreter parameterized by an algebraic abstract domain describing finite and infinite computations that can be instantiated for various operational, denotational, or relational program semantics. Considering semantics as program properties, we define a post algebraic transformer for execution properties (e.g. sets of traces) and a Post algebraic transformer for semantic (hyper) properties (e.g. sets of sets of traces), we provide corresponding calculuses as instances of the generic abstract interpreter, and we derive under and over approximation hyperlogics.
In part II, we define exact and approximate semantic abstractions, and show that they preserve the mathematical structure of the algebraic semantics, the collecting semantics post, the hyper collecting semantics Post, and the hyperlogics.
Since proofs by sound and complete hyperlogics require an exact characterization of the program semantics within the proof, we consider in part III abstractions of the (hyper) semantic properties that yield simplified proof rules. These abstractions include the join, the homomorphic, the elimination, the principal ideal, the order ideal, the frontier order ideal, and the chain limit algebraic abstractions, as well as their combinations, that lead to new algebraic generalizations of hyperlogics, including the ∀∃ * , ∀∀ * , and ∃∀ * hyperlogics.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 57a9d5f9-ef6c-402b-ae7e-6d817fcd0ecbCited by top-tier papers2
- U-Turn: Enhancing Incorrectness Analysis by Reversing DirectionFlavio Ascari, Roberto Bruni, Roberta Gori, Azalea RaadPOPL 2026 · 2 citations
- Systematic Design of Separation LogicsRoberto Bruni, Lorenzo Gazzella, Roberta GoriOOPSLA 2026
Builds on7
- Incorrectness logicPeter W. O'HearnPOPL 2020 · 122 citations
- Software Verification of Hyperproperties Beyond k-SafetyRaven Beutner, Bernd FinkbeinerCAV 2022 · 44 citations
- Hyper Hoare Logic: (Dis-)Proving Program HyperpropertiesThibault Dardinier, Peter MüllerPLDI 2024 · 28 citations
- On incorrectness logic for Quantum programsPeng Yan, Hanru Jiang, Nengkun YuOOPSLA 2022 · 27 citations
- Second-Order HyperpropertiesRaven Beutner, Bernd Finkbeiner, Hadar Frenkel, Niklas MetzgerCAV 2023 · 20 citations
Related papers
- Proving hypersafety compositionallyEmanuele D'Osualdo, Azadeh Farzan, Derek DreyerOOPSLA 2022 · 16 citations
- Syntax-Guided Automated Program Repair for HyperpropertiesRaven Beutner, Tzu-Han Hsu, Borzoo Bonakdarpour, Bernd FinkbeinerCAV 2024 · 4 citations
- The Best of Abstract InterpretationsRoberto Giacobazzi, Francesco RanzatoPOPL 2025 · 1 citation
- Hyper Separation LogicTrayan Gospodinov, Peter Müller, Thibault DardinierPLDI 2026 · 1 citation
- Decision and Complexity of Dolev-Yao HyperpropertiesItsaka Rakotonirina, Gilles Barthe, Clara SchneidewindPOPL 2024 · 13 citations
