Efficiently Scaling LLM Reasoning Programs with Certaindex
Yichao Fu, Junda Chen, Siqi Zhu, Zheyu Fu, Zhongdongming Dai, Yonghao Zhuang, Yian Ma, Aurick Qiao, Tajana Simunic Rosing, Ion Stoica, Hao Zhang
Abstract
Test-time reasoning algorithms such as chain-of-thought, self-consistency, and MCTS enhance LLM problem-solving but can wastefully generate many tokens without improving accuracy. At the same time, we observe that these algorithms exhibit answer stabilization: their intermediate solutions often cease to change after a certain point, and further investment of compute does not change their final answer. To quantify this phenomenon, we introduce Certaindex, an algorithm-agnostic metric measuring this evolving stability, signaling when further computation is unlikely to alter the final result. Certaindex is lightweight, can accelerate reasoning program inference via early exit, and further enables dynamic token allocation, gang scheduling, and many opportunities when integrated with real-world LLM serving systems. To quantify real-world benefits, we built Certaindex as a scheduler into Dynasor, our reasoning-aware LLM serving system, and demonstrate up to 50% compute savings and 3.3× higher throughput in real workloads with no accuracy drop. Our code is available at https://github.com/hao-ai-lab/ Dynasor.git.
• Work done while interning at UCSD 39th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS 2025). Recent work has shown that allocating more compute at inference time, so-called "test-time scaling", consistently boosts performance on hard reasoning tasks [8; 14; 15]. Methods such as Chain-of-Thought (CoT) [16], Best-of-N sampling [17; 18], Self-Consistency (SC) [4], and search-based
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 57296467-7b7c-4b52-bd2f-1ea6610e5d64Cited by top-tier papers2
- Statistical Early Stopping for Reasoning ModelsYangxinyu Xie, Tao Wang, Soham Mallick, Yan Sun et al.ICML 2026 · 4 citations
- SAT: Balancing Reasoning Accuracy and Efficiency with Stepwise Adaptive ThinkingWeiyang Huang, Xuefeng Bai, Kehai Chen, Xinyang Chen et al.ACL 2026 · 3 citations
Builds on32
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language ModelsShunyu Yao, Dian Yu, Jeffrey Zhao, Izhak Shafran et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,068 citations
- Let's Verify Step by StepHunter Lightman, Vineet Kosaraju, Yuri Burda, Harrison Edwards et al.ICLR 2024 · 3,045 citations
- SGLang: Efficient Execution of Structured Language Model ProgramsLianmin Zheng, Liangsheng Yin, Zhiqiang Xie, Chuyue Sun et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 1,586 citations
- Teaching Large Language Models to Self-DebugXinyun Chen, Maxwell Lin, Nathanael Schärli, Denny ZhouICLR 2024 · 1,085 citations
Related papers
- Think Deep, Not Just Long: Measuring LLM Reasoning Effort via Deep-Thinking TokensWei-Lin Chen, Liqian Peng, Tian Tan, Chao Zhao et al.ICML 2026 · 20 citations
- The Evolution of Thought: Tracking LLM Overthinking via Reasoning Dynamics AnalysisZihao Wei, Liang Pang, Jiahao Liu, Wenjie Shi et al.ACL 2026 · 14 citations
- PASCAL: A Phase-Aware Scheduling Algorithm for Serving Reasoning-based Large Language ModelsEunyeong Cho, Jehyeon Bang, Ranggi Hwang, Minsoo RhuHPCA 2026
- Stop When Further Reasoning Won’t Help: Attention-State Adaptive Generation in Reasoning ModelsJiakai Li, KE QIN, Rongzheng Wang, Yizhuo Ma et al.ICML 2026
- Token Signature: Predicting Chain-of-Thought Gains with Token Decoding Feature in Large Language ModelsPeijie Liu, Fengli Xu, Yong LiICML 2025
