Learning Behaviors Mediate the Effect of AI-powered Support for Metacognitive Calibration on Learning Outcomes
Haejin Lee, Frank Stinar, Ruohan Zong, Hannah Valdiviejas, Dong Wang, Nigel Bosch
Abstract
Students struggle with accurately assessing their own performance, especially given little training to do so. We propose an AI-powered training tool to help students improve "metacognitive calibration, " or the ability to accurately predict their own learning, potentially enhancing learning outcomes by enabling students' use of metacognitioninformed learning behaviors. We present results from a randomized controlled trial (N = 133) assessing the effectiveness of the tool in a college-level computer-based learning environment. The AIdriven tool significantly improved learning gains compared to the control group by 8.9% (t = -2.384, p = .019), and this effect was significantly mediated by learning behaviors. Overconfident students who received the intervention showed significantly greater metacognitive calibration improvement than the control group by 4.1% (t = 2.001, p = .049). These insights highlight the value of AIpowered metacognitive calibration training and the importance of promoting specific metacognition-informed learning behaviors in computer-based learning.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on9
- The Metacognitive Demands and Opportunities of Generative AILev Tankelevitch, Viktor Kewenig, Auste Simkute, Ava Elizabeth Scott et al.CHI 2024 · 279 citations
- Mathemyths: Leveraging Large Language Models to Teach Mathematical Language through Child-AI Co-Creative StorytellingChao Zhang, Xuechen Liu, Katherine Ziska, Soobin Jeon et al.CHI 2024 · 93 citations
- Reading Between the Lines: Modeling User Behavior and Costs in AI-Assisted ProgrammingHussein Mozannar, Gagan Bansal, Adam Fourney, Eric HorvitzCHI 2024 · 88 citations
- Learning Agent-based Modeling with LLM Companions: Experiences of Novices and Experts Using ChatGPT & NetLogo ChatJohn Chen, Xi Lu, Yuzhou Du, Michael Rejtig et al.CHI 2024 · 47 citations
- Ivie: Lightweight Anchored Explanations of Just-Generated CodeLitao Yan, Alyssa Hwang, Zhiyuan Wu, Andrew HeadCHI 2024 · 40 citations
Related papers
- Uncalibrated Models Can Improve Human-AI CollaborationKailas Vodrahalli, Tobias Gerstenberg, James Y. ZouNeurIPS 2022 · 47 citations
- MetaFaith: Faithful Natural Language Uncertainty Expression in LLMsGabrielle Kaili-May Liu, Gal Yona, Avi Caciularu, Idan Szpektor et al.EMNLP 2025
- Knowing About Knowing: An Illusion of Human Competence Can Hinder Appropriate Reliance on AI SystemsGaole He, Lucie Kuiper, Ujwal GadirajuCHI 2023 · 101 citations
- Students' Verbalized Metacognition During Computerized LearningNigel Bosch, Yingbin Zhang, Luc Paquette, Ryan Baker et al.CHI 2021 · 20 citations
- "Are You Really Sure?" Understanding the Effects of Human Self-Confidence Calibration in AI-Assisted Decision MakingShuai Ma, Xinru Wang, Ying Lei, Chuhan Shi et al.CHI 2024 · 54 citations
