Concept Concentration for Faithful Representation Intervention
Hongzheng Yang, Yongqiang Chen, Zeyu Qin, Tongliang Liu, Chaowei Xiao, Kun Zhang, Bo Han
Abstract
Representation intervention aims to locate and modify the representations that encode the underlying concepts in Large Language Models (LLMs) to elicit the aligned and expected behaviors. Despite the empirical success, it has never been examined whether one could locate the faithful concepts for intervention. In this work, we explore the question in safety alignment. If the interventions are faithful, the intervened LLMs should erase the harmful concepts and be robust to both in-distribution adversarial prompts and the out-of-distribution (OOD) jailbreaks. While it is feasible to erase harmful concepts without degrading the benign utility of LLMs in linear settings, we show that it is infeasible in the general non-linear setting. To tackle the issue, we propose Concept Concentration (COCA). COCA refactors the training data with an explicit reasoning process, which first identifies the potential unsafe concepts and then decides the responses. Essentially, COCA simplifies the decision boundary between harmful and benign representations, enabling more effective linear erasure. Extensive experiments with multiple representation intervention methods and model architectures demonstrate that COCA significantly reduces both in-distribution and OOD jailbreak success rates, and meanwhile maintaining strong performance on regular tasks such as math and code generation. Our code is publicly available at: https://github.com/tmlr-group/COCA.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 564ee6c6-591e-4ffd-a7b2-5c9de7fade4dBuilds on23
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language ModelsShunyu Yao, Dian Yu, Jeffrey Zhao, Izhak Shafran et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,068 citations
- Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTKevin Meng, David Bau, Alex Andonian, Yonatan BelinkovNeurIPS 2022 · 3,415 citations
- HarmBench: A Standardized Evaluation Framework for Automated Red Teaming and Robust RefusalMantas Mazeika, Long Phan, Xuwang Yin, Andy Zou et al.ICML 2024 · 1,031 citations
Related papers
- JBShield: Defending Large Language Models from Jailbreak Attacks through Activated Concept Analysis and ManipulationShenyi Zhang, Yuchen Zhai, Keyan Guo, Hongxin Hu et al.USENIX Security 2025
- On Prompt-Driven Safeguarding for Large Language ModelsChujie Zheng, Fan Yin, Hao Zhou, Fandong Meng et al.ICML 2024 · 116 citations
- SAFEPATH: Preventing Harmful Reasoning in Chain-of-Thought via Early AlignmentWonje Jeung, Sangyeon Yoon, Minsuk Kahng, Albert NoNeurIPS 2025 · 31 citations
- Large Language Models Are Involuntary Truth-Tellers: Exploiting Fallacy Failure for Jailbreak AttacksYue Zhou, Henry Peng Zou, Barbara Di Eugenio, Yang ZhangEMNLP 2024 · 3 citations
- ARMOR: Aligning Secure and Safe Large Language Models via Meticulous ReasoningZhengyue Zhao, Yingzi Ma, Somesh Jha, Marco Pavone et al.ICLR 2026 · 8 citations
