Scalable and Flexible Causal Discovery with an Efficient Test for Adjacency
Alan Nawzad Amin, Andrew Gordon Wilson
Abstract
To make accurate predictions, understand mechanisms, and design interventions in systems of many variables, we wish to learn causal graphs from large scale data. Unfortunately the space of all possible causal graphs is enormous so scalably and accurately searching for the best fit to the data is a challenge. In principle we could substantially decrease the search space, or learn the graph entirely, by testing the conditional independence of variables. However, deciding if two variables are adjacent in a causal graph may require an exponential number of tests. Here we build a scalable and flexible method to evaluate if two variables are adjacent in a causal graph, the Differentiable Adjacency Test (DAT). DAT replaces an exponential number of tests with a provably equivalent relaxed problem. It then solves this problem by training two neural networks. We build a graph learning method based on DAT, DAT-Graph, that can also learn from data with interventions. DAT-Graph can learn graphs of 1000 variables with state of the art accuracy. Using the graph learned by DAT-Graph, we also build models that make much more accurate predictions of the effects of interventions on large scale RNA sequencing data.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 562f94b9-8d70-4b44-abfa-9a4dc01f129cCited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on14
- Gradient-Based Neural DAG LearningSébastien Lachapelle, Philippe Brouillard, Tristan Deleu, Simon Lacoste-JulienICLR 2020 · 337 citations
- Differentiable Causal Discovery from Interventional DataPhilippe Brouillard, Sébastien Lachapelle, Alexandre Lacoste, Simon Lacoste-Julien et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 295 citations
- DAGMA: Learning DAGs via M-matrices and a Log-Determinant Acyclicity CharacterizationKevin Bello, Bryon Aragam, Pradeep RavikumarNeurIPS 2022 · 222 citations
- Beware of the Simulated DAG! Causal Discovery Benchmarks May Be Easy to GameAlexander G. Reisach, Christof Seiler, Sebastian WeichwaldNeurIPS 2021 · 213 citations
- Score Matching Enables Causal Discovery of Nonlinear Additive Noise ModelsPaul Rolland, Volkan Cevher, Matthäus Kleindessner, Chris Russell et al.ICML 2022 · 123 citations
Related papers
- Large-Scale Differentiable Causal Discovery of Factor GraphsRomain Lopez, Jan-Christian Hütter, Jonathan K. Pritchard, Aviv RegevNeurIPS 2022 · 78 citations
- Stable Differentiable Causal DiscoveryAchille Nazaret, Justin Hong, Elham Azizi, David M. BleiICML 2024 · 29 citations
- Learning to Induce Causal StructureNan Rosemary Ke, Silvia Chiappa, Jane X. Wang, Jörg Bornschein et al.ICLR 2023 · 17 citations
- From Temporal to Contemporaneous Iterative Causal Discovery in the Presence of Latent ConfoundersRaanan Y. Rohekar, Shami Nisimov, Yaniv Gurwicz, Gal NovikICML 2023 · 12 citations
- Differentiable Cyclic Causal Discovery Under Unmeasured ConfoundersMuralikrishnna G. Sethuraman, Faramarz FekriNeurIPS 2025 · 5 citations
