Bounding Box Stability against Feature Dropout Reflects Detector Generalization across Environments
Yang Yang, Wenhai Wang, Zhe Chen, Jifeng Dai, Liang Zheng
Abstract
Bounding boxes uniquely characterize object detection, where a good detector gives accurate bounding boxes of categories of interest. However, in the real-world where test ground truths are not provided, it is non-trivial to find out whether bounding boxes are accurate, thus preventing us from assessing the detector generalization ability. In this work, we find under feature map dropout, good detectors tend to output bounding boxes whose locations do not change much, while bounding boxes of poor detectors will undergo noticeable position changes. We compute the box stability score (BoS score) to reflect this stability. Specifically, given an image, we compute a normal set of bounding boxes and a second set after feature map dropout. To obtain BoS score, we use bipartite matching to find the corresponding boxes between the two sets and compute the average Intersection over Union (IoU) across the entire test set. We contribute to finding that BoS score has a strong, positive correlation with detection accuracy measured by mean average precision (mAP) under various test environments. This relationship allows us to predict the accuracy of detectors on various real-world test sets without accessing test ground truths, verified on canonical detection tasks such as vehicle detection and pedestrian detection. Code and data are available at https://github.com/YangYangGirl/BoS.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers3
- Towards Unsupervised Model Selection for Domain Adaptive Object DetectionHengfu Yu, Jinhong Deng, Wen Li, Lixin DuanNeurIPS 2024 · 7 citations
- Automated Model Evaluation for Object Detection Via Prediction Consistency and ReliabilitySeungju Yoo, Hyuk Kwon, Joong-Won Hwang, Kibok LeeICCV 2025 · 1 citation
- Can We Predict Performance of Large Models across Vision-Language Tasks?Qinyu Zhao, Ming Xu, Kartik Gupta, Akshay Asthana et al.ICML 2025
Builds on20
- Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted WindowsZe Liu, Yutong Lin, Yue Cao, Han Hu et al.ICCV 2021 · 31,683 citations
- Deformable DETR: Deformable Transformers for End-to-End Object DetectionXizhou Zhu, Weijie Su, Lewei Lu, Bin Li et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,353 citations
- FCOS: Fully Convolutional One-Stage Object DetectionZhi Tian, Chunhua Shen, Hao Chen, Tong HeICCV 2019 · 6,042 citations
- CenterNet: Keypoint Triplets for Object DetectionKaiwen Duan, Song Bai, Lingxi Xie, Honggang Qi et al.ICCV 2019 · 3,348 citations
- DINO: DETR with Improved DeNoising Anchor Boxes for End-to-End Object DetectionHao Zhang, Feng Li, Shilong Liu, Lei Zhang et al.ICLR 2023 · 753 citations
Related papers
- Rigidity-Aware Detection for 6D Object Pose EstimationYang Hai, Rui Song, Jiaojiao Li, Mathieu Salzmann et al.CVPR 2023
- Gaussian YOLOv3: An Accurate and Fast Object Detector Using Localization Uncertainty for Autonomous DrivingJiwoong Choi, Dayoung Chun, Hyun Kim, Hyuk-Jae LeeICCV 2019 · 445 citations
- Optimal Correction Cost for Object Detection EvaluationMayu Otani, Riku Togashi, Yuta Nakashima, Esa Rahtu et al.CVPR 2022 · 18 citations
- Decoupled IoU Regression for Object DetectionYan Gao, Qimeng Wang, Xu Tang, Haochen Wang et al.ACM MM 2021 · 25 citations
- Pixel-level Quality Assessment for Oriented Object DetectionYunhui Zhu, Buliao HuangAAAI 2026
