SESCORE2: Learning Text Generation Evaluation via Synthesizing Realistic Mistakes
Wenda Xu, Xian Qian, Mingxuan Wang, Lei Li, William Yang Wang
Abstract
Is it possible to train a general metric for evaluating text generation quality without humanannotated ratings? Existing learned metrics either perform unsatisfactorily across text generation tasks or require human ratings for training on specific tasks. In this paper, we propose SESCORE2, a self-supervised approach for training a model-based metric for text generation evaluation. The key concept is to synthesize realistic model mistakes by perturbing sentences retrieved from a corpus. The primary advantage of the SESCORE2 is its ease of extension to many other languages while providing reliable severity estimation. We evaluate SESCORE2 and previous methods on four text generation tasks across three languages. SESCORE2 outperforms unsupervised metric PRISM on four text generation evaluation benchmarks, with a Kendall improvement of 0.078. Surprisingly, SESCORE2 even outperforms the supervised BLEURT and COMET on multiple text generation tasks. The code and data are available at https://github.com/ xu1998hz/SEScore2 1 .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 55f7a8fb-953f-42dc-9fb7-4a06b60a7d8dCited by top-tier papers2
- MuCAL: Contrastive Alignment for Preference-Driven KG-to-Text GenerationYifei Song, Claire GardentEMNLP 2025
- The Reasonableness Behind Unreasonable Translation Capability of Large Language ModelTingchen Fu, Lemao Liu, Deng Cai, Guoping Huang et al.ICLR 2024
Builds on10
- BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTTianyi Zhang, Varsha Kishore, Felix Wu, Kilian Q. Weinberger et al.ICLR 2020 · 8,443 citations
- SimCSE: Simple Contrastive Learning of Sentence EmbeddingsTianyu Gao, Xingcheng Yao, Danqi ChenEMNLP 2021 · 2,496 citations
- BARTScore: Evaluating Generated Text as Text GenerationWeizhe Yuan, Graham Neubig, Pengfei LiuNeurIPS 2021 · 1,143 citations
- Evaluating the Factual Consistency of Abstractive Text SummarizationWojciech Kryscinski, Bryan McCann, Caiming Xiong, Richard SocherEMNLP 2020 · 67 citations
- BLEURT: Learning Robust Metrics for Text GenerationThibault Sellam, Dipanjan Das, Ankur P. ParikhACL 2020 · 40 citations
Related papers
- CTRLEval: An Unsupervised Reference-Free Metric for Evaluating Controlled Text GenerationPei Ke, Hao Zhou, Yankai Lin, Peng Li et al.ACL 2022
- Evaluating Language Translation Models by Playing TelephoneSyeda Jannatus Saba, Steven SkienaEMNLP 2025
- Global Explainability of BERT-Based Evaluation Metrics by Disentangling along Linguistic FactorsMarvin Kaster, Wei Zhao, Steffen EgerEMNLP 2021 · 13 citations
- On the Blind Spots of Model-Based Evaluation Metrics for Text GenerationTianxing He, Jingyu Zhang, Tianle Wang, Sachin Kumar et al.ACL 2023 · 10 citations
- INSTRUCTSCORE: Towards Explainable Text Generation Evaluation with Automatic FeedbackWenda Xu, Danqing Wang, Liangming Pan, Zhenqiao Song et al.EMNLP 2023 · 36 citations
