MANSA: Learning Fast and Slow in Multi-Agent Systems
David Henry Mguni, Haojun Chen, Taher Jafferjee, Jianhong Wang, Longfei Yue, Xidong Feng, Stephen Marcus McAleer, Feifei Tong, Jun Wang, Yaodong Yang
Abstract
In multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL), independent learning (IL) often shows remarkable performance and easily scales with the number of agents. Yet, using IL can be inefficient and runs the risk of failing to successfully train, particularly in scenarios that require agents to coordinate their actions. Using centralised learning (CL) enables MARL agents to quickly learn how to coordinate their behaviour but employing CL everywhere is often prohibitively expensive in real-world applications. Besides, using CL in value-based methods often needs strong representational constraints (e.g. individual-global-max condition) that can lead to poor performance if violated. In this paper, we introduce a novel plug & play IL framework named Multi-Agent Network Selection Algorithm (MANSA) which selectively employs CL only at states that require coordination. At its core, MANSA has an additional agent that uses switching controls to quickly learn the best states to activate CL during training, using CL only where necessary and vastly reducing the computational burden of CL. Our theory proves MANSA preserves cooperative MARL convergence properties, boosts IL performance and can optimally make use of a fixed budget on the number CL calls. We show empirically in Level-based Foraging (LBF) and StarCraft Multi-agent Challenge (SMAC) that MANSA achieves fast, superior and more reliable performance while making 40% fewer CL calls in SMAC and using CL at only 1% CL calls in LBF.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 55e08dee-effb-4239-81b8-e8aeee9b4cabCited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on7
- Weighted QMIX: Expanding Monotonic Value Function Factorisation for Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement LearningTabish Rashid, Gregory Farquhar, Bei Peng, Shimon WhitesonNeurIPS 2020 · 1,960 citations
- QPLEX: Duplex Dueling Multi-Agent Q-LearningJianhao Wang, Zhizhou Ren, Terry Liu, Yang Yu et al.ICLR 2021 · 595 citations
- Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Active Voltage Control on Power Distribution NetworksJianhong Wang, Wangkun Xu, Yunjie Gu, Wenbin Song et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 216 citations
- Shapley Q-Value: A Local Reward Approach to Solve Global Reward GamesJianhong Wang, Yuan Zhang, Tae-Kyun Kim, Yunjie GuAAAI 2020 · 159 citations
- Saute RL: Almost Surely Safe Reinforcement Learning Using State AugmentationAivar Sootla, Alexander I. Cowen-Rivers, Taher Jafferjee, Ziyan Wang et al.ICML 2022 · 80 citations
Related papers
- LIGS: Learnable Intrinsic-Reward Generation Selection for Multi-Agent LearningDavid Henry Mguni, Taher Jafferjee, Jianhong Wang, Nicolas Perez Nieves et al.ICLR 2022 · 20 citations
- Inverse Factorized Soft Q-Learning for Cooperative Multi-agent Imitation LearningThe Viet Bui, Tien Mai, Thanh Hong NguyenNeurIPS 2024 · 10 citations
- MASER: Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning with Subgoals Generated from Experience Replay BufferJeewon Jeon, Woojun Kim, Whiyoung Jung, Youngchul SungICML 2022 · 53 citations
- Learning Robust Multi-Agent Policies via Selective Adversarial Fault InductionDavid H Mguni, Yaqi Sun, Haojun Chen, Wanrong Yang et al.ICML 2026
- LDSA: Learning Dynamic Subtask Assignment in Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement LearningMingyu Yang, Jian Zhao, Xunhan Hu, Wengang Zhou et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 61 citations
