Cycle Self-Training for Semi-Supervised Object Detection with Distribution Consistency Reweighting
Hao Liu, Bin Chen, Bo Wang, Chunpeng Wu, Feng Dai, Peng Wu
Abstract
Recently, many semi-supervised object detection (SSOD) methods adopt teacher-student framework and have achieved state-of-the-art results. However, the teacher network is tightly coupled with the student network since the teacher is an exponential moving average (EMA) of the student, which causes a performance bottleneck. To address the coupling problem, we propose a Cycle Self-Training (CST) framework for SSOD, which consists of two teachers T1 and T2, two students S1 and S2. Based on these networks, a cycle self-training mechanism is built, i.e., S1T1S2T2S1. For ST, we also utilize the EMA weights of the students to update the teachers. For TS, instead of providing supervision for its own student S1(S2) directly, the teacher T1(T2) generates pseudo-labels for the student S2(S1), which looses the coupling effect. Moreover, owing to the property of EMA, the teacher is most likely to accumulate the biases from the student and make the mistakes irreversible. To mitigate the problem, we also propose a distribution consistency reweighting strategy, where pseudo-labels are reweighted based on distribution consistency across the teachers T1 and T2. With the strategy, the two students S2 and S1 can be trained robustly with noisy pseudo labels to avoid confirmation biases. Extensive experiments prove the superiority of CST by consistently improving the AP over the baseline and outperforming state-of-the-art methods by 2.1% absolute AP improvements with scarce labeled data.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 559a0f7e-4e4d-4b08-8d40-07eb4f13a160Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on24
- Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted WindowsZe Liu, Yutong Lin, Yue Cao, Han Hu et al.ICCV 2021 · 31,683 citations
- Deformable DETR: Deformable Transformers for End-to-End Object DetectionXizhou Zhu, Weijie Su, Lewei Lu, Bin Li et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,353 citations
- FCOS: Fully Convolutional One-Stage Object DetectionZhi Tian, Chunhua Shen, Hao Chen, Tong HeICCV 2019 · 6,042 citations
- FixMatch: Simplifying Semi-Supervised Learning with Consistency and ConfidenceKihyuk Sohn, David Berthelot, Nicholas Carlini, Zizhao Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 5,129 citations
- CenterNet: Keypoint Triplets for Object DetectionKaiwen Duan, Song Bai, Lingxi Xie, Honggang Qi et al.ICCV 2019 · 3,348 citations
Related papers
- Label Matching Semi-Supervised Object DetectionBinbin Chen, Weijie Chen, Shicai Yang, Yunyi Xuan et al.CVPR 2022 · 87 citations
- Instant-Teaching: An End-to-End Semi-Supervised Object Detection FrameworkQiang Zhou, Chaohui Yu, Zhibin Wang, Qi Qian et al.CVPR 2021
- Switching Temporary Teachers for Semi-Supervised Semantic SegmentationJaemin Na, Jung-Woo Ha, Hyung Jin Chang, Dongyoon Han et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 72 citations
- Interactive Self-Training With Mean Teachers for Semi-Supervised Object DetectionQize Yang, Xihan Wei, Biao Wang, Xian-Sheng Hua et al.CVPR 2021
- Humble Teachers Teach Better Students for Semi-Supervised Object DetectionYihe Tang, Weifeng Chen, Yijun Luo, Yuting ZhangCVPR 2021
