GOHSP: A Unified Framework of Graph and Optimization-Based Heterogeneous Structured Pruning for Vision Transformer
Miao Yin, Burak Uzkent, Yilin Shen, Hongxia Jin, Bo Yuan
Abstract
The recently proposed Vision transformers (ViTs) have shown very impressive empirical performance in various computer vision tasks, and they are viewed as an important type of foundation model. However, ViTs are typically constructed with large-scale sizes, which then severely hinder their potential deployment in many practical resources constrained applications. To mitigate this challenging problem, structured pruning is a promising solution to compress model size and enable practical efficiency. However, unlike its current popularity for CNNs and RNNs, structured pruning for ViT models is little explored. In this paper, we propose GOHSP, a unified framework of Graph and Optimization-based Structured Pruning for ViT models. We first develop a graph-based ranking for measuring the importance of attention heads, and the extracted importance information is further integrated to an optimization-based procedure to impose the heterogeneous structured sparsity patterns on the ViT models. Experimental results show that our proposed GOHSP demonstrates excellent compression performance. On CIFAR-10 dataset, our approach can bring 40% parameters reduction with no accuracy loss for ViT-Small model. On ImageNet dataset, with 30% and 35% sparsity ratio for DeiT-Tiny and DeiT-Small models, our approach achieves 1.65% and 0.76% accuracy increase over the existing structured pruning methods, respectively.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers5
- Discovering Sparsity Allocation for Layer-wise Pruning of Large Language ModelsLujun Li, Peijie Dong, Zhenheng Tang, Xiang Liu et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 51 citations
- Adaptive Layer Sparsity for Large Language Models via Activation Correlation AssessmentWei Li, Lujun Li, Mark G. Lee, Shengjie SunNeurIPS 2024 · 39 citations
- COMCAT: Towards Efficient Compression and Customization of Attention-Based Vision ModelsJinqi Xiao, Miao Yin, Yu Gong, Xiao Zang et al.ICML 2023 · 17 citations
- BVT-IMA: Binary Vision Transformer with Information-Modified AttentionZhenyu Wang, Hao Luo, Xuemei Xie, Fan Wang et al.AAAI 2024 · 4 citations
- Adaptive Pruning of Pretrained Transformer via Differential InclusionsYizhuo Ding, Ke Fan, Yikai Wang, Xinwei Sun et al.ICLR 2025
Builds on13
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Training data-efficient image transformers & distillation through attentionHugo Touvron, Matthieu Cord, Matthijs Douze, Francisco Massa et al.ICML 2021 · 8,974 citations
- DynamicViT: Efficient Vision Transformers with Dynamic Token SparsificationYongming Rao, Wenliang Zhao, Benlin Liu, Jiwen Lu et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 1,343 citations
- Scaling Vision TransformersXiaohua Zhai, Alexander Kolesnikov, Neil Houlsby, Lucas BeyerCVPR 2022 · 767 citations
- MetaPruning: Meta Learning for Automatic Neural Network Channel PruningZechun Liu, Haoyuan Mu, Xiangyu Zhang, Zichao Guo et al.ICCV 2019 · 633 citations
Related papers
- Unified Visual Transformer CompressionShixing Yu, Tianlong Chen, Jiayi Shen, Huan Yuan et al.ICLR 2022 · 118 citations
- Global Vision Transformer Pruning with Hessian-Aware SaliencyHuanrui Yang, Hongxu Yin, Maying Shen, Pavlo Molchanov et al.CVPR 2023
- Rethinking Depth Pruning for Vision Transformers: A Heterogeneity-Aware PerspectiveZhenfeng Su, Kang Zhao, Han Bao, Tao Yuan et al.ICML 2026
- CAP: Correlation-Aware Pruning for Highly-Accurate Sparse Vision ModelsDenis Kuznedelev, Eldar Kurtic, Elias Frantar, Dan AlistarhNeurIPS 2023 · 24 citations
- Chasing Sparsity in Vision Transformers: An End-to-End ExplorationTianlong Chen, Yu Cheng, Zhe Gan, Lu Yuan et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 295 citations
