Learning Situated Awareness in the Real World
Chuhan Li, Rilyn Han, Joy Hsu, Yongyuan Liang, Rajiv Dhawan, Jiajun Wu, Ming-Hsuan Yang, Xin (Eric) Wang
Abstract
A core aspect of human perception is situated awareness , the ability to relate ourselves to the surrounding physical environment and reason over possible actions in context. However, most existing benchmarks for multimodal foundation models (MFMs) emphasize environment-centric spatial relations (relations among objects in a scene), while largely overlooking observer-centric relationships that require reasoning relative to agent's viewpoint, pose, and motion. To bridge this gap, we introduce SAW-Bench ( S ituated A wareness in the Real W orld), a novel benchmark for evaluating egocentric situated awareness using real-world videos. SAW-Bench comprises 786 self-recorded videos captured with Ray-Ban Meta (Gen 2) smart glasses spanning diverse indoor and outdoor environments, and over 2071 human-annotated question-answer pairs. It probes a model’s observer–environment understanding with six different awareness tasks. Our comprehensive evaluation reveals a human-model performance gap of 31.97%, even with the best-performing MFM, Gemini 3 Flash. Beyond this gap, our in-depth analysis uncovers several notable findings; for example, while models can exploit partial geometric cues in egocentric videos, they often fail to infer a coherent camera geometry, leading to systematic spatial reasoning errors. We position SAW-Bench as a benchmark for situated spatial intelligence, moving beyond passive observation to understanding physically grounded, observer-centric dynamics.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 5468ec33-26dc-4553-a314-42bf9c55be45Builds on20
- MMMU-Pro: A More Robust Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding BenchmarkXiang Yue, Tianyu Zheng, Yuansheng Ni, Yubo Wang et al.ACL 2025 · 377 citations
- MMSI-Bench: A Benchmark for Multi-Image Spatial IntelligenceSihan Yang, Runsen Xu, Yiman Xie, Sizhe Yang et al.ICLR 2026 · 195 citations
- Socratic Models: Composing Zero-Shot Multimodal Reasoning with LanguageAndy Zeng, Maria Attarian, Brian Ichter, Krzysztof Marcin Choromanski et al.ICLR 2023 · 171 citations
- OmniSpatial: Towards Comprehensive Spatial Reasoning Benchmark for Vision Language ModelsMengdi Jia, Zekun Qi, Shaochen Zhang, Wenyao Zhang et al.ICLR 2026 · 109 citations
- Multi-View Transformer for 3D Visual GroundingShijia Huang, Yilun Chen, Jiaya Jia, Liwei WangCVPR 2022 · 97 citations
Related papers
- From Where Things Are to What They Are For: Benchmarking Spatial–Functional Intelligence in Multimodal LLMsLe Zhang, Jihan Yang, Soundarya Krishnan, Jimit Majmudar et al.CVPR 2026 · 2 citations
- Seeing from Another Perspective: Evaluating Multi-View Understanding in MLLMsChun-Hsiao Yeh, Chenyu Wang, Shengbang Tong, Ta Ying Cheng et al.AAAI 2026 · 35 citations
- From Indoor to Open World: Revealing the Spatial Reasoning Gap in MLLMsMingrui Wu, Zhaozhi Wang, Fangjinhua Wang, Jiaolong Yang et al.CVPR 2026 · 11 citations
- SciVideoBench: Benchmarking Scientific Video Reasoning in Large Multimodal ModelsAndong Deng, Taojiannan Yang, Shoubin Yu, Lincoln Spencer et al.ICML 2026 · 7 citations
- Spatial Reasoning with Vision-Language Models in Ego-Centric Multi-View ScenesMohsen Gholami, Ahmad Rezaei, Zhou Weimin, Sitong Mao et al.ICLR 2026 · 67 citations
