Perceptual Quality Assessment of 3D Gaussian Splatting: A Subjective Dataset and Prediction Metric
Zhaolin Wan, Yining Diao, Jingqi Xu, Hao Wang, Zhiyang Li, Xiaopeng Fan, Wangmeng Zuo, Debin Zhao
Abstract
With the rapid advancement of 3D visualization, 3D Gaussian Splatting (3DGS) has emerged as a leading technique for real-time, high-fidelity rendering. While prior research has emphasized algorithmic performance and visual fidelity, the perceptual quality of 3DGS-rendered content, especially under varying reconstruction conditions, remains largely underexplored. In practice, factors such as viewpoint sparsity, limited training iterations, point downsampling, noise, and color distortions can significantly degrade visual quality, yet their perceptual impact has not been systematically studied. To bridge this gap, we present 3DGS-QA, the first subjective quality assessment dataset for 3DGS. It comprises 225 degraded reconstructions across 15 object types, enabling a controlled investigation of common distortion factors. Based on this dataset, we introduce a no-reference quality prediction model that directly operates on native 3D Gaussian primitives, without requiring rendered images or ground-truth references. Our model extracts spatial and photometric cues from the Gaussian representation to estimate perceived quality in a structure-aware manner. We further benchmark existing quality assessment methods, spanning both traditional and learning-based approaches. Experimental results show that our method consistently achieves superior performance, highlighting its robustness and effectiveness for 3DGS content evaluation. The dataset and code are made publicly available at https://github.com/diaoyn/3DGSQA to facilitate future research in 3DGS quality assessment.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 540e8d29-04ea-40da-90b4-88dcb9c23b7bBuilds on6
- 3D Gaussian Splatting for Real-Time Radiance Field RenderingBernhard Kerbl, Georgios Kopanas, Thomas Leimkühler, George DrettakisSIGGRAPH 2023 · 5,687 citations
- Exploring CLIP for Assessing the Look and Feel of ImagesJianyi Wang, Kelvin C. K. Chan, Chen Change LoyAAAI 2023 · 1,208 citations
- GSCore: Efficient Radiance Field Rendering via Architectural Support for 3D Gaussian SplattingJunseo Lee, Seokwon Lee, Jungi Lee, Junyong Park et al.ASPLOS 2024 · 77 citations
- CLIP-PCQA: Exploring Subjective-Aligned Vision-Language Modeling for Point Cloud Quality AssessmentYating Liu, Yujie Zhang, Ziyu Shan, Yiling XuAAAI 2025 · 9 citations
- Blindly Assess Image Quality in the Wild Guided by a Self-Adaptive Hyper NetworkShaolin Su, Qingsen Yan, Yu Zhu, Cheng Zhang et al.CVPR 2020
Related papers
- GaussFusion: Improving 3D Reconstruction in the Wild with A Geometry-Informed Video GeneratorLiyuan Zhu, Manjunath Narayana, Michal Stary, Will Hutchcroft et al.CVPR 2026 · 7 citations
- Prune Wisely, Reconstruct Sharply: Compact 3D Gaussian Splatting via Adaptive Pruning and Difference-of-Gaussian PrimitivesHaoran Wang, Guoxi Huang, Fan Zhang, David Bull et al.CVPR 2026 · 6 citations
- DGS: Depth-and-Density Guided Gaussian Splatting for Stable and Accurate Sparse-View ReconstructionMeixi Song, Xin Lin, Dizhe Zhang, Haodong Li et al.ICLR 2026 · 5 citations
- Faster-GS: Analyzing and Improving Gaussian Splatting OptimizationFlorian Hahlbohm, Linus Franke, Martin Eisemann, Marcus A. MagnorCVPR 2026 · 16 citations
- Hardware-Rasterized Ray-Based Gaussian SplattingSamuel Rota Bulò, Nemanja Bartolovic, Lorenzo Porzi, Peter KontschiederCVPR 2025
