Robustifying Sequential Neural Processes
Jaesik Yoon, Gautam Singh, Sungjin Ahn
Abstract
When tasks change over time, meta-transfer learning seeks to improve the efficiency of learning a new task via both meta-learning and transfer-learning. While the standard attention has been effective in a variety of settings, we question its effectiveness in improving meta-transfer learning since the tasks being learned are dynamic and the amount of context can be substantially smaller. In this paper, using a recently proposed meta-transfer learning model, Sequential Neural Processes (SNP), we first empirically show that it suffers from a similar underfitting problem observed in the functions inferred by Neural Processes. However, we further demonstrate that unlike the meta-learning setting, the standard attention mechanisms are not effective in meta-transfer setting. To resolve, we propose a new attention mechanism, Recurrent Memory Reconstruction (RMR), and demonstrate that providing an imaginary context that is recurrently updated and reconstructed with interaction is crucial in achieving effective attention for meta-transfer learning. Furthermore, incorporating RMR into SNP, we propose Attentive Sequential Neural Processes-RMR (ASNP-RMR) and demonstrate in various tasks that ASNP-RMR significantly outperforms the baselines.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 53903b34-ef4e-4739-83a5-b242c0a793b5Cited by top-tier papers9
- NP-Match: When Neural Processes meet Semi-Supervised LearningJianfeng Wang, Thomas Lukasiewicz, Daniela Massiceti, Xiaolin Hu et al.ICML 2022 · 45 citations
- Learning Expressive Meta-Representations with Mixture of Expert Neural ProcessesQi Wang, Herke van HoofNeurIPS 2022 · 35 citations
- Neural Processes with Stochastic Attention: Paying more attention to the context datasetMingyu Kim, Kyeongryeol Go, Se-Young YunICLR 2022 · 21 citations
- Back2Future: Leveraging Backfill Dynamics for Improving Real-time Predictions in FutureHarshavardhan Kamarthi, Alexander Rodríguez, B. Aditya PrakashICLR 2022 · 20 citations
- Graph Neural Processes for Spatio-Temporal ExtrapolationJunfeng Hu, Yuxuan Liang, Zhencheng Fan, Hongyang Chen et al.KDD 2023 · 19 citations
Builds on3
- A Meta-Transfer Objective for Learning to Disentangle Causal MechanismsYoshua Bengio, Tristan Deleu, Nasim Rahaman, Nan Rosemary Ke et al.ICLR 2020 · 371 citations
- Recurrent Independent MechanismsAnirudh Goyal, Alex Lamb, Jordan Hoffmann, Shagun Sodhani et al.ICLR 2021 · 357 citations
- Convolutional Conditional Neural ProcessesJonathan Gordon, Wessel P. Bruinsma, Andrew Y. K. Foong, James Requeima et al.ICLR 2020 · 200 citations
Related papers
- Transformers are Meta-Reinforcement LearnersLuckeciano C. MeloICML 2022 · 66 citations
- Memory Efficient Neural Processes via Constant Memory Attention BlockLeo Feng, Frederick Tung, Hossein Hajimirsadeghi, Yoshua Bengio et al.ICML 2024 · 8 citations
- Meta Temporal Point ProcessesWonho Bae, Mohamed Osama Ahmed, Frederick Tung, Gabriel L. OliveiraICLR 2023 · 14 citations
- Transformer Neural Processes: Uncertainty-Aware Meta Learning Via Sequence ModelingTung Nguyen, Aditya GroverICML 2022 · 148 citations
- Task-adaptive Neural Process for User Cold-Start RecommendationXixun Lin, Jia Wu, Chuan Zhou, Shirui Pan et al.WWW 2021 · 115 citations
