Automated Symbolic Law Discovery: A Computer Vision Approach
Hengrui Xing, Ansaf Salleb-Aouissi, Nakul Verma
Abstract
One of the most exciting applications of modern artificial intelligence is to automatically discover scientific laws from experimental data. This is not a trivial problem as it involves searching for a complex mathematical relationship over a large set of explanatory variables and operators that can be combined in an infinite number of ways.
Inspired by the incredible success of deep learning in computer vision, we tackle this problem by adapting various successful network architectures into the symbolic law discovery pipeline. The novelty of our approach is in (1) encoding the input data as an image with super-resolution, (2) developing an appropriate deep network pipeline, and (3) predicting the importance of each mathematical operator from the relationship image. This allows us to prior the exponentially large search with the predicted importance of the symbolic operators, which can significantly accelerate the discovery process.
We apply our model to a variety of plausible relationships---both simulated and from physics and mathematics domains---involving different dimensions and constituents. We show that our model is able to identify the underlying operators from data, achieving a high accuracy and AUC (91% and 0.96 on average resp.) for systems with as many as ten independent variables. Our method significantly outperforms the current state of the art in terms of data fitting (R^2), discovery rate (recovering the true relationship), and succinctness (output formula complexity). The discovered equations can be seen as first drafts of scientific laws that can be helpful to the scientists for (1) hypothesis building, and (2) understanding the complex underlying structure of the studied phenomena. Our approach holds a real promise to help speed up the rate of scientific discovery.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itRelated papers
- LLM-SR: Scientific Equation Discovery via Programming with Large Language ModelsParshin Shojaee, Kazem Meidani, Shashank Gupta, Amir Barati Farimani et al.ICLR 2025
- Universal Physics-Informed Neural Networks: Symbolic Differential Operator Discovery with Sparse DataLena Podina, Brydon Eastman, Mohammad KohandelICML 2023 · 25 citations
- Neural Symbolic Regression that scalesLuca Biggio, Tommaso Bendinelli, Alexander Neitz, Aurélien Lucchi et al.ICML 2021 · 251 citations
- DecAEvolve: Decompose, Adapt, and Evolve for Effective LLM-based Scientific Equation DiscoveryPouya Behzadifar, Parshin Shojaee, Sanchit Kabra, Kazem Meidani et al.ICML 2026
- GINN-LP: A Growing Interpretable Neural Network for Discovering Multivariate Laurent Polynomial EquationsNisal Ranasinghe, Damith A. Senanayake, Sachith Seneviratne, Malin Premaratne et al.AAAI 2024 · 8 citations
