SoFi: Reflection-Augmented Fuzzing for JavaScript Engines
Xiaoyu He, Xiaofei Xie, Yuekang Li, Jianwen Sun, Feng Li, Wei Zou, Yang Liu, Lei Yu, Jianhua Zhou, Wenchang Shi, Wei Huo
Abstract
JavaScript engines have been shown prone to security vulnerabilities, which can lead to serious consequences due to their popularity. Fuzzing is an effective testing technique to discover vulnerabilities. The main challenge of fuzzing JavaScript engines is to generate syntactically and semantically valid inputs such that deep functionalities can be explored. However, due to the dynamic nature of JavaScript and the special features of different engines, it is quite challenging to generate semantically meaningful test inputs. We observed that state-of-the-art semantic-aware JavaScript fuzzers usually require manually written rules to analyze the semantics for a JavaScript engine, which is labor-intensive, incomplete and engine-specific. Moreover, the error rate of generated test cases is still high. Another challenge is that existing fuzzers cannot generate new method calls that are not included in the initial seed corpus or pre-defined rules, which limits the bug-finding capability. To this end, we propose a novel semantic-aware fuzzing technique named SoFi. To guarantee the validity of the generated test cases, SoFi adopts a fine-grained program analysis to identify available variables and infer types of these variables for the mutation. Moreover, an automatic repair strategy is proposed to repair syntax/semantic errors in invalid test cases. To improve the exploration capability of SoFi, we propose a reflection-based analysis to identify unseen attributes and methods of objects, which are further used in the mutation. With fine-grained analysis and reflection-based augmentation, SoFi can generate more valid and diverse test cases. Besides, SoFi is general in different JavaScript engines without any manual configuration (e.g., the grammar rules). The evaluation results have shown that SoFi outperforms state-of-the-art techniques in generating semantically valid inputs, improving code coverage and detecting more bugs. SoFi discovered 51 bugs in popular JavaScript engines, 28 of which have been confirmed or fixed by the developers and 10 CVE IDs have been assigned.
Ask about this paper
Ask your agent about it.
Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.
Your agent calls
Lunesearch_papers
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers get 5311feee-a24c-46d5-b2e9-9fae7569b575Cited by top-tier papers13
- SoK: Prudent Evaluation Practices for FuzzingMoritz Schloegel, Nils Bars, Nico Schiller, Lukas Bernhard et al.S&P 2024 · 69 citations
- JIT-Picking: Differential Fuzzing of JavaScript EnginesLukas Bernhard, Tobias Scharnowski, Moritz Schloegel, Tim Blazytko et al.CCS 2022 · 42 citations
- Validating JIT Compilers via Compilation Space ExplorationCong Li, Yanyan Jiang, Chang Xu, Zhendong SuSOSP 2023 · 22 citations
- Minerva: browser API fuzzing with dynamic mod-ref analysisChijin Zhou, Quan Zhang, Mingzhe Wang, Lihua Guo et al.FSE 2022 · 20 citations
- Fuzzing MLIR Compiler Infrastructure via Operation Dependency AnalysisChenyao Suo, Junjie Chen, Shuang Liu, Jiajun Jiang et al.ISSTA 2024 · 12 citations
Related papers
- CodeAlchemist: Semantics-Aware Code Generation to Find Vulnerabilities in JavaScript EnginesHyungSeok Han, DongHyeon Oh, Sang Kil ChaNDSS 2019 · 178 citations
- BCFuzz: Bytecode-Driven Fuzzing for JavaScript EnginesJiming Wang, Chenggang Wu, Jikai Ren, Yuhao Hu et al.ASE 2025 · 1 citation
- Extraction and Mutation at a High Level: Template-Based Fuzzing for JavaScript EnginesWai Kin Wong, Dongwei Xiao, Anthony Cheuk Tung Lai, Yiteng Peng et al.OOPSLA 2025 · 4 citations
- FuzzJIT: Oracle-Enhanced Fuzzing for JavaScript Engine JIT CompilerJunjie Wang, Zhiyi Zhang, Shuang Liu, Xiaoning Du et al.USENIX Security 2023
- Fuzzing JavaScript Engines with Aspect-preserving MutationSoyeon Park, Wen Xu, Insu Yun, Daehee Jang et al.S&P 2020 · 126 citations
