Active Learning with Selective Time-Step Acquisition for PDEs
Yegon Kim, Hyunsu Kim, Gyeonghoon Ko, Juho Lee
Abstract
Accurately solving partial differential equations (PDEs) is critical to understanding complex scientific and engineering phenomena, yet traditional numerical solvers are computationally expensive. Surrogate models offer a more efficient alternative, but their development is hindered by the cost of generating sufficient training data from numerical solvers. In this paper, we present a novel framework for active learning in PDE surrogate modeling that reduces this cost. Unlike the existing AL methods for PDEs that always acquire entire PDE trajectories, our approach, STAP (Selective Time-Step Acquisition for PDEs), strategically generates only the most important time steps with the numerical solver, while employing the surrogate model to approximate the remaining steps. This reduces the cost incurred by each trajectory and thus allows the active learning algorithm to try out a more diverse set of trajectories given the same budget. To accommodate this novel framework, we develop an acquisition function that estimates the utility of a set of time steps by approximating its resulting variance reduction. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our method on several benchmark PDEs.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 52cdcb43-6224-498d-9501-0ad1ac021c3aBuilds on8
- Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential EquationsZongyi Li, Nikola Borislavov Kovachki, Kamyar Azizzadenesheli, Burigede Liu et al.ICLR 2021 · 3,911 citations
- Learning to Simulate Complex Physics with Graph NetworksAlvaro Sanchez-Gonzalez, Jonathan Godwin, Tobias Pfaff, Rex Ying et al.ICML 2020 · 1,439 citations
- Deep Batch Active Learning by Diverse, Uncertain Gradient Lower BoundsJordan T. Ash, Chicheng Zhang, Akshay Krishnamurthy, John Langford et al.ICLR 2020 · 974 citations
- Message Passing Neural PDE SolversJohannes Brandstetter, Daniel E. Worrall, Max WellingICLR 2022 · 410 citations
- PDE-Refiner: Achieving Accurate Long Rollouts with Neural PDE SolversPhillip Lippe, Bas Veeling, Paris Perdikaris, Richard E. Turner et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 280 citations
Related papers
- Active Learning for Neural PDE SolversDaniel Musekamp, Marimuthu Kalimuthu, David Holzmüller, Makoto Takamoto et al.ICLR 2025
- A Plug-and-Play Query Synthesis Active Learning Framework for Neural PDE SolversZhiyuan Wang, Jinwoo Go, Byung-Jun Yoon, Nathan M. Urban et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 1 citation
- Active Learning for Derivative-Based Global Sensitivity Analysis with Gaussian ProcessesSyrine Belakaria, Ben Letham, Jana Doppa, Barbara Engelhardt et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 7 citations
- Disentangled Multi-Fidelity Deep Bayesian Active LearningDongxia Wu, Ruijia Niu, Matteo Chinazzi, Yi-An Ma et al.ICML 2023 · 15 citations
- Learning Differential Equations that are Easy to SolveJacob Kelly, Jesse Bettencourt, Matthew J. Johnson, David DuvenaudNeurIPS 2020 · 134 citations
