Learning the Structure of Large Networked Systems Obeying Conservation Laws
Anirudh Rayas, Rajasekhar Anguluri, Gautam Dasarathy
Abstract
Many networked systems such as electric networks, the brain, and social networks of opinion dynamics are known to obey conservation laws. Examples of this phenomenon include the Kirchoff laws in electric networks and opinion consensus in social networks. Conservation laws in networked systems may be modeled as balance equations of the form X = B * Y , where the sparsity pattern of B * ∈ R p×p captures the connectivity of the network on p nodes, and Y, X ∈ R p are vectors of "potentials" and "injected flows" at the nodes respectively. The node potentials Y cause flows across edges and the flows X injected at the nodes are extraneous to the network dynamics. In several practical systems, the network structure is often unknown and needs to be estimated from data to facilitate modeling, management, and control. To this end, one has access to samples of the node potentials Y , but only the statistics of the node injections X. Motivated by this important problem, we study the estimation of the sparsity structure of the matrix B * from n samples of Y under the assumption that the node injections X follow a Gaussian distribution with a known covariance Σ X . We propose a new 1 -regularized maximum likelihood estimator for tackling this problem in the high-dimensional regime where the size of the network may vastly be larger than the number of samples n. We show that this optimization problem is convex in the objective and admits a unique solution. Under a new mutual incoherence condition, we establish sufficient conditions on the triple (n, p, d) for which exact sparsity recovery of B * is possible with high probability; d is the degree of the underlying graph. We also establish guarantees for the recovery of B * in the element-wise maximum, Frobenius, and operator norms. Finally, we complement these theoretical results with experimental validation of the performance of the proposed estimator on synthetic and real-world data.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 52a1fa45-daef-4b91-ad51-e483ad6a57fbRelated papers
- True Nonlinear Dynamics from Incomplete NetworksChunheng Jiang, Jianxi Gao, Malik Magdon-IsmailAAAI 2020 · 14 citations
- Physics-Informed Implicit Representations of Equilibrium Network FlowsKevin D. Smith, Francesco Seccamonte, Ananthram Swami, Francesco BulloNeurIPS 2022 · 16 citations
- Fine-Grained System Identification of Nonlinear Neural CircuitsDawna Bagherian, James Gornet, Jeremy Bernstein, Yu-Li Ni et al.KDD 2021 · 3 citations
- Rate-Optimal Subspace Estimation on Random GraphsZhixin Zhou, Fan Zhou, Ping Li, Cun-Hui ZhangNeurIPS 2021 · 3 citations
- Limits on Testing Structural Changes in Ising ModelsAditya Gangrade, Bobak Nazer, Venkatesh SaligramaNeurIPS 2020
