How to use Graph Data in the Wild to Help Graph Anomaly Detection?
Yuxuan Cao, Jiarong Xu, Chen Zhao, Jiaan Wang, Carl Ji Yang, Chunping Wang, Yang Yang
Abstract
In recent years, graph anomaly detection has gained considerable attention and has found extensive applications in various domains such as social, financial, and communication networks. However, anomalies in graph-structured data present unique challenges, including label scarcity, ill-defined anomalies, and varying anomaly types, making supervised or semi-supervised methods unreliable. Researchers often adopt unsupervised approaches to address these challenges, assuming that anomalies deviate significantly from the normal data distribution. Yet, when the available data is insufficient, capturing the normal distribution accurately and comprehensively becomes difficult. To overcome this limitation, we propose to utilize external graph data (i.e., graph data in the wild ) to help anomaly detection tasks. This naturally raises the question: How can we use external data to help graph anomaly detection task? To answer this question, we propose a novel framework Wild-GAD. Our framework is built upon a unified database, UniWildGraph, which comprises a large and diverse collection of graph data with broad domain coverage, ample data volume, and a unified feature space. Further, we develop selection criteria based on representativity and diversity to identify the most suitable external data for each anomaly detection task. Extensive experiments on six real-world test datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of Wild-GAD. Compared to the baseline methods, our framework has an average 18% AUCROC and 32% AUCPR improvement over the best-competing methods.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 526a2922-1d88-4584-80aa-20a81bfa5d02Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on23
- Graph Contrastive Learning with AugmentationsYuning You, Tianlong Chen, Yongduo Sui, Ting Chen et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 3,042 citations
- Beyond Homophily in Graph Neural Networks: Current Limitations and Effective DesignsJiong Zhu, Yujun Yan, Lingxiao Zhao, Mark Heimann et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 1,490 citations
- Graph Contrastive Learning with Adaptive AugmentationYanqiao Zhu, Yichen Xu, Feng Yu, Qiang Liu et al.WWW 2021 · 1,415 citations
- Data Augmentation for Graph Neural NetworksTong Zhao, Yozen Liu, Leonardo Neves, Oliver J. Woodford et al.AAAI 2021 · 487 citations
- BernNet: Learning Arbitrary Graph Spectral Filters via Bernstein ApproximationMingguo He, Zhewei Wei, Zengfeng Huang, Hongteng XuNeurIPS 2021 · 378 citations
Related papers
- A Graph Foundation Model for Unified Anomaly DetectionRenda Han, Xiaobao Wang, Luzhi Wang, Wenxin Zhang et al.WWW 2026 · 1 citation
- Generalizable Graph-level Anomaly Detection via Prompted Anomaly Expansion and Normality ExtractionGe Zhang, Jiapei Chen, Guohao Sun, Xiu Fang et al.WWW 2026
- OwlEye: Zero-Shot Learner for Cross-Domain Graph Data Anomaly DetectionLecheng Zheng, Dongqi Fu, Zihao Li, Jingrui HeICLR 2026 · 2 citations
- Unifying Unsupervised Graph-Level Anomaly Detection and Out-of-Distribution Detection: A BenchmarkYili Wang, Yixin Liu, Xu Shen, Chenyu Li et al.ICLR 2025 · 2 citations
- Generative Semi-supervised Graph Anomaly DetectionHezhe Qiao, Qingsong Wen, Xiaoli Li, Ee-Peng Lim et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 48 citations
