Why We Need New Benchmarks for Local Intrinsic Dimension Estimation
Piotr Tempczyk, Dominik Filipiak, Lukasz Garncarek, Ksawery Smoczynski, Adam Kurpisz
Abstract
Neural Local Intrinsic Dimension (LID) estimators are typically bound to domain-specific architectures whose inductive biases can yield inconsistent estimates for the same underlying manifold. Existing evaluations either use overly simple synthetic data (with known LID) or real datasets (with unknown LID), obscuring true performance. We introduce a principled benchmarking framework that (i) maps the same manifold into multiple domain representations while preserving its structure, enabling like-for-like cross-architecture tests; (ii) designs harder variants of popular datasets that target key manifold properties; and (iii) applies controlled transformations with known LID shifts to stress-test methods even when absolute LID is unknown. Across this suite, including non-trivial synthetic datasets, we show that accuracy on simple manifolds does not transfer across domains and that state-of-the-art methods fail under targeted stressors, revealing clear failure modes and areas for improvement. Data and code are available: https://github.com/DominikFilipiak/LID-Benchmarks.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 523b9d2f-a8b2-407f-9c81-72afe4e600e7Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on12
- Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic ModelsJonathan Ho, Ajay Jain, Pieter AbbeelNeurIPS 2020 · 35,902 citations
- The Intrinsic Dimension of Images and Its Impact on LearningPhillip Pope, Chen Zhu, Ahmed Abdelkader, Micah Goldblum et al.ICLR 2021 · 381 citations
- Contrastive Learning Inverts the Data Generating ProcessRoland S. Zimmermann, Yash Sharma, Steffen Schneider, Matthias Bethge et al.ICML 2021 · 264 citations
- Flows for simultaneous manifold learning and density estimationJohann Brehmer, Kyle CranmerNeurIPS 2020 · 187 citations
- Rectangular Flows for Manifold LearningAnthony L. Caterini, Gabriel Loaiza-Ganem, Geoff Pleiss, John P. CunninghamNeurIPS 2021 · 58 citations
Related papers
- LIDL: Local Intrinsic Dimension Estimation Using Approximate LikelihoodPiotr Tempczyk, Rafal Michaluk, Lukasz Garncarek, Przemyslaw Spurek et al.ICML 2022 · 39 citations
- A Geometric Explanation of the Likelihood OOD Detection ParadoxHamidreza Kamkari, Brendan Leigh Ross, Jesse C. Cresswell, Anthony L. Caterini et al.ICML 2024 · 20 citations
- A Geometric View of Data Complexity: Efficient Local Intrinsic Dimension Estimation with Diffusion ModelsHamidreza Kamkari, Brendan Leigh Ross, Rasa Hosseinzadeh, Jesse C. Cresswell et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 49 citations
- A Wiener Process Perspective on Local Intrinsic Dimension Estimation MethodsPiotr Tempczyk, Lukasz Garncarek, Dominik Filipiak, Adam KurpiszAAAI 2025 · 2 citations
- The Data Manifold under the MicroscopeMarios Koulakis, Constantin SeiboldICML 2026
